Photoelectric factor prediction using automated learning and uncertainty quantification

被引:0
|
作者
Khalid Alsamadony
Ahmed Farid Ibrahim
Salaheldin Elkatatny
Abdulazeez Abdulraheem
机构
[1] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Department of Petroleum Engineering
[2] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Center for Integrative Petroleum Research
来源
Neural Computing and Applications | 2023年 / 35卷
关键词
Machine learning algorithms; Well logging; Photoelectric factor; Automated learning; Uncertainty quantification; Gaussian process regression; Fuzzy logic; Artificial neural network (ANN);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The photoelectric factor (PEF) is an important well-logging tool to distinguish between different types of reservoir rocks because PEF measurement is sensitive to elements with high atomic numbers. Furthermore, the ratio of rock minerals could be determined by combining PEF log with other well logs. However, PEF logs could be missing in some cases such as in old well logs and wells drilled with barite-based mud. Therefore, developing models for estimating missing PEF logs is essential in those circumstances. In this work, we developed various machine learning models to predict PEF values using the following well logs as inputs: bulk density (RHOB), neutron porosity (NPHI), gamma ray (GR), compressional and shear velocity. The predictions of PEF values using adaptive-network-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN) models have errors of about 16% and 14% average absolute percentage error (AAPE) in the testing dataset, respectively. Thus, a different approach was proposed that is based on the concept of automated machine learning. It works by automatically searching for the optimal model type and optimizes its hyperparameters for the dataset under investigation. This approach selected a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model for the accurate estimation of PEF values. The developed GPR model decreases the AAPE of the predicted PEF values in the testing dataset to about 10% AAPE. This error could be further decreased to about 2% by modeling the potential noise in the measurements using the GPR model.
引用
收藏
页码:22595 / 22604
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AutoDEUQ: Automated Deep Ensemble with Uncertainty Quantification
    Egele, Romain
    Maulik, Romit
    Raghavan, Krishnan
    Lusch, Bethany
    Guyon, Isabelle
    Balaprakash, Prasanna
    2022 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2022, : 1908 - 1914
  • [42] Uncertainty Quantification in Computational and Prediction Science
    Ghanem, Roger G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 80 (6-7) : 671 - 672
  • [43] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION: A STOCHASTIC METHOD FOR HEAT TRANSFER PREDICTION USING LES
    Carnevale, M.
    Montomoli, F.
    D'Ammaro, A.
    Salvadori, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2012, VOL 4, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 59 - +
  • [44] Quantification of Aircraft Trajectory Prediction Uncertainty using Polynomial Chaos Expansions
    Casado, Enrique
    La Civita, Marco
    Vilaplana, Miguel
    McGookin, Euan W.
    2017 IEEE/AIAA 36TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2017,
  • [45] Uncertainty Quantification: A Stochastic Method for Heat Transfer Prediction Using LES
    Carnevale, M.
    Montomoli, F.
    D'Ammaro, A.
    Salvadori, S.
    Martelli, F.
    JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (05):
  • [46] Preference Learning in Automated Negotiation Using Gaussian Uncertainty Models
    Leahu, Haralambie
    Kaisers, Michael
    Baarslag, Tim
    AAMAS '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, : 2087 - 2089
  • [47] Flood Prediction and Uncertainty Estimation Using Deep Learning
    Gude, Vinayaka
    Corns, Steven
    Long, Suzanna
    WATER, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [48] Detecting Uncertainty of Mortality Prediction Using Confident Learning
    Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein
    Lee, Joon
    2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, : 1719 - 1722
  • [49] Conformal Prediction and Uncertainty Wrapper: What Statistical Guarantees Can You Get for Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning?
    Joeckel, Lisa
    Klaes, Michael
    Gross, Janek
    Gerber, Pascal
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2023 WORKSHOPS, 2023, 14182 : 314 - 327
  • [50] Prediction of Software Defects Using Automated Machine Learning
    Tanaka, Kazuya
    Monden, Akito
    Yucel, Zeynep
    2019 20TH IEEE/ACIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, NETWORKING AND PARALLEL/DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING (SNPD), 2019, : 490 - 494