Photoelectric factor prediction using automated learning and uncertainty quantification

被引:0
|
作者
Khalid Alsamadony
Ahmed Farid Ibrahim
Salaheldin Elkatatny
Abdulazeez Abdulraheem
机构
[1] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Department of Petroleum Engineering
[2] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Center for Integrative Petroleum Research
来源
Neural Computing and Applications | 2023年 / 35卷
关键词
Machine learning algorithms; Well logging; Photoelectric factor; Automated learning; Uncertainty quantification; Gaussian process regression; Fuzzy logic; Artificial neural network (ANN);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The photoelectric factor (PEF) is an important well-logging tool to distinguish between different types of reservoir rocks because PEF measurement is sensitive to elements with high atomic numbers. Furthermore, the ratio of rock minerals could be determined by combining PEF log with other well logs. However, PEF logs could be missing in some cases such as in old well logs and wells drilled with barite-based mud. Therefore, developing models for estimating missing PEF logs is essential in those circumstances. In this work, we developed various machine learning models to predict PEF values using the following well logs as inputs: bulk density (RHOB), neutron porosity (NPHI), gamma ray (GR), compressional and shear velocity. The predictions of PEF values using adaptive-network-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN) models have errors of about 16% and 14% average absolute percentage error (AAPE) in the testing dataset, respectively. Thus, a different approach was proposed that is based on the concept of automated machine learning. It works by automatically searching for the optimal model type and optimizes its hyperparameters for the dataset under investigation. This approach selected a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model for the accurate estimation of PEF values. The developed GPR model decreases the AAPE of the predicted PEF values in the testing dataset to about 10% AAPE. This error could be further decreased to about 2% by modeling the potential noise in the measurements using the GPR model.
引用
收藏
页码:22595 / 22604
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Photoelectric factor prediction using automated learning and uncertainty quantification
    Alsamadony, Khalid
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Farid
    Elkatatny, Salaheldin
    Abdulraheem, Abdulazeez
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (30): : 22595 - 22604
  • [2] Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification Using Evidential Deep Learning
    Ben Ayed, Safa
    Broujeny, Roozbeh Sadeghian
    Hamza, Rachid Tahar
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2025, 15 (01) : 37 - 55
  • [3] Uncertainty Quantification for Learning-based MPC using Weighted Conformal Prediction
    Chee, Kong Yao
    Hsieh, M. Ani
    Pappas, George J.
    2023 62ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, CDC, 2023, : 342 - 349
  • [4] Uncertainty quantification for probabilistic machine learning in earth observation using conformal prediction
    Singh, Geethen
    Moncrieff, Glenn
    Venter, Zander
    Cawse-Nicholson, Kerry
    Slingsby, Jasper
    Robinson, Tamara B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Uncertainty quantification of machine learning models: on conformal prediction
    Akpabio, Inimfon I.
    Savari, Serap A.
    JOURNAL OF MICRO-NANOPATTERNING MATERIALS AND METROLOGY-JM3, 2021, 20 (04):
  • [6] Prediction and the quantification of uncertainty
    Dept. of Appl. Math. and Statistics, University at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3600, United States
    不详
    Phys D Nonlinear Phenom, 1-4 (152-170):
  • [7] Prediction and the quantification of uncertainty
    Glimm, J
    Sharp, DH
    PHYSICA D, 1999, 133 (1-4): : 152 - 170
  • [8] A Survey of Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Space Weather Prediction
    Siddique, Talha
    Mahmud, Md Shaad
    Keesee, Amy M.
    Ngwira, Chigomezyo M.
    Connor, Hyunju
    GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [9] Uncertainty quantification of a deep learning fuel property prediction model
    Yalamanchi, Kiran K.
    Kommalapati, Sahil
    Pal, Pinaki
    Kuzhagaliyeva, Nursulu
    Alramadan, Abdullah S.
    Mohan, Balaji
    Pei, Yuanjiang
    Sarathy, S. Mani
    Cenker, Emre
    Badra, Jihad
    APPLICATIONS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2023, 16
  • [10] Automated uncertainty quantification analysis using a system model and data
    Nannapaneni, Saideep
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    Lechevalier, David
    Narayanan, Anantha
    Rachuri, Sudarsan
    PROCEEDINGS 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA, 2015, : 1408 - 1417