Agency in Educational Technology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Implications for Learning Design

被引:0
|
作者
Garvin Brod
Natalia Kucirkova
Joshua Shepherd
Dietsje Jolles
Inge Molenaar
机构
[1] DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education,Department of Psychology
[2] Goethe University,Norwegian Centre for Learning Environment and Behavioural Research
[3] University of Stavanger,Department of Philosophy
[4] Carleton University,Institute of Education and Child Studies
[5] University of Barcelona,Behavioural Science Institute and National Education Lab AI
[6] Universiteit Leiden,undefined
[7] Radboud University,undefined
[8] The Open University,undefined
来源
关键词
Agency; Educational technology; Control; Choice; Learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advancing learners’ agency is a key educational goal. The advent of personalized EdTech, which automatically tailor learning environments to individual learners, gives renewed relevance to the topic. EdTech researchers and practitioners are confronted with the same basic question: What is the right amount of agency to give to learners during their interactions with EdTech? This question is even more relevant for younger learners. Our aim in this paper is twofold: First, we outline and synthesize the ways in which agency is conceptualized in three key learning disciplines (philosophy, education, and psychology). We show that there are different types and levels of agency and various prerequisites for the effective exercise of agency and that these undergo developmental change. Second, we provide guiding principles for how agency can be designed for in EdTech for children. We propose an agency personalization loop in which the level of agency provided by the EdTech is assigned in an adaptive manner to strike a balance between allowing children to freely choose learning content and assigning optimal content to them. Finally, we highlight some examples from practice.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Assemblage, enactment and agency: educational policy perspectives
    Viczko, Melody
    Riveros, Augusto
    [J]. DISCOURSE-STUDIES IN THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF EDUCATION, 2015, 36 (04) : 479 - 484
  • [23] Implications of learning technology standardization in electronic design
    Anido, L
    [J]. EDUTECH: WHERE COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN MEETS COMPUTER-AIDED LEARNING, 2004, 151 : 51 - 54
  • [24] CREATIVITY, TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING AND LEARNER AGENCY: DEVELOPING PEDAGOGIES OF SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH AN INTERDISCIPLINARY LENS
    Sclater, Madeleine
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 6532 - 6535
  • [25] International perspectives on the design of technology supported learning environments
    Zimmermann, RS
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, 2000, 44 (01) : 108 - 110
  • [26] A Framework for Analyzing Interdisciplinary Tasks: Implications for Student Learning and Curricular Design
    Gouvea, Julia Svoboda
    Sawtelle, Vashti
    Geller, Benjamin D.
    Turpen, Chandra
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 12 (02): : 187 - 205
  • [27] Perspectives on Technology and Educational Change
    Strudler, Neal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 42 (03) : 221 - 229
  • [28] Design of an Online Educational Board Game for Membrane Technology Learning
    Wang, Jui-Jong
    Hung, Min-Hsiang
    Yan, Jia-Yi
    Yang, Jo-Chi
    Fan, Chang-Wei
    Yu, Wan-Ting
    Sung, Cai-Syuan
    Hung, Wei-Song
    Hou, Huei-Tse
    [J]. 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION, ICCE 2022, VOL 2, 2022, : 650 - 652
  • [29] Learning technology standardization in Europe - Implications in electronic design
    Van Assche, F
    [J]. EDUTECH: WHERE COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN MEETS COMPUTER-AIDED LEARNING, 2004, 151 : 69 - 73
  • [30] IMPROVING LEARNING TECHNOLOGY DESIGN THROUGH THE IDENTIFICATION OF ANTHROPOLOGICALLY INVARIANT LEARNING BEHAVIORS IN THE ADOPTION OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
    Walk, Steven R.
    [J]. 2012 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2012,