Minimally invasive implantation technique of a system for spinal cord stimulation

被引:0
|
作者
Kasapovic, Adnan [1 ]
Rommelspacher, Yorck [2 ]
Walter, Sebastian [1 ]
Gathen, Martin [1 ]
Pflugmacher, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Bonn, Klin Pol Orthopadie & Unfallchirurg, Venusberg Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Augustinerinnen Koln, Klin Orthopadie, Cologne, Germany
来源
关键词
Spinal cord stimulation; Chronic pain syndrome; Failed back surgery syndrome; Complex regional pain syndrome; High frequency spinal cord stimulation; FAILED BACK SURGERY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00064-021-00700-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) targets structures of the dorsal column and dorsal horn of the spinal cord with electrical impulses, thereby, modulating pain perception. For chronic pain patients, e.g., in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), the aim is to achieve pain relief and enable patients to improve their quality of life. Indications Failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I and II, therapy-refractory ischemic pain, neuropathic pain syndromes (e.g., phantom limb pain). Contraindications Identification of degenerative alterations as the cause of pain; untreated mental illness. Surgical technique A two-stage implantation technique is performed. Initially, after percutaneous implantation of epidural leads a trial period with stimulation by an external pulse generator is evaluated. Following verification of pain relief, a subcutaneous internal pulse generator is implanted. Follow-up Early mobilization and adjustment of stimulation parameters. Results In all, 19 consecutive patients with FBSS were treated by high frequency SCS (HF-SCS) and included in a prospective prognostic study. In 18 patients, an internal pulse generator (IPG) for HF-SCS was permanently implanted. Therapy success was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and painDetect questionnaire. Neuropathic pain of the legs versus the back (median values: VAS leg 71 mm, VAS back 69 mm) was dominant in the patients at a preoperative mean ODI of 63%. With HF-SCS therapy, a pronounced pain reduction was seen and persisted in the follow-up after 6 months (VAS leg 18 mm, VAS back 24 mm). The ODI showed an improvement to a mean of 24% after 6 months.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 373
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep Brain Stimulation and Spinal Cord Stimulation for Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State
    Yamamoto, Takamitsu
    Katayama, Yoichi
    Obuchi, Toshiki
    Kobayashi, Kazutaka
    Oshima, Hideki
    Fukaya, Chikashi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 80 (3-4) : S30.e1 - S30.e9
  • [42] Spinal cord stimulation: patient selection, technique, and outcomes
    Oakley, JC
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 14 (03) : 365 - +
  • [43] Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgical Technique for the Nonsurgically Trained
    Bedder, Marshall D.
    Bedder, Helen F.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2009, 12 : 1 - 19
  • [44] Treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men with spinal cord injury: minimally invasive = minimally effective?
    Pannek, J.
    Wollner, J.
    SPINAL CORD, 2017, 55 (08) : 739 - 742
  • [45] Treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men with spinal cord injury: minimally invasive=minimally effective?
    J Pannek
    J Wöllner
    Spinal Cord, 2017, 55 : 739 - 742
  • [46] Ergogenic effects of invasive and non-invasive spinal cord stimulation strategies following spinal cord injury: a case series
    Hodgkiss, D. D.
    Williams, A. M. M.
    Shackleton, S.
    Samejima, S.
    Balthazaar, S. J. T.
    Lam, T.
    Krassioukov, A. V.
    Nightingale, T. E.
    CELL TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 33
  • [47] Medtronic develops minimally invasive spinal fusion system
    不详
    ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 2006, 164 (01): : 78 - 78
  • [48] A Minimally Invasive Technique for the Implantation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices
    Wilson, David F.
    Kim, Harold H.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2013, 149 (03) : 473 - 477
  • [49] Recurrent rejection of a spinal cord stimulation system
    Kemler, MA
    Bardense, GAM
    van Kleef, M
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (05) : 304 - 305
  • [50] A SYSTEM FOR EPIDURAL SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION
    DIMITRIJEVIC, MR
    SHERWOOD, AM
    APPLIED NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 45 (4-5) : 465 - 467