A combined qualitative–quantitative fuzzy method for urban flood resilience assessment in Karaj City, Iran

被引:0
|
作者
Kousha Khatooni
Farhad Hooshyaripor
Bahram MalekMohammadi
Roohollah Noori
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch
[2] University of Tehran,School of Environment, College of Engineering
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to analyze flood resilience (FR) in Karaj City, Iran, using a new fuzzy method which combines several qualitative and quantitative indices. The qualitative part was estimated by a questionnaire consisting of 42 questions distributed into five indices (social-cultural, economic, infrastructural-physical, organizational-institutional, and hydraulic). A fuzzy method was used for analyzing the results. To quantify the hydraulic index, a 25-year flood was simulated in the Storm Water Management Model and the flooding volume at every grid was estimated. The idea was that the flooding amount could be representative of structural FR of drainage network that cannot be evaluated through a questionnaire well. To calculate the FR of different districts, the obtained FR indices were fuzzified then aggregated. Considering that clustering can assist managers and decision makers for more effective flood risk management, a fuzzy equivalence matrix concept was used for clustering FR in the city. Friedman test showed the significance of differences between FR of every two districts. Based on the results, northwestern and southeastern districts had the highest and the lowest resilience, respectively. Although the impact of infrastructure-physical index on the FR was similar in most of the districts, the contribution of social-cultural, organizational-institutional, and hydraulic indices was significantly different. Also, districts with low scores in the infrastructure-physical, organizational-institutional, and hydraulic indices need more attention for flood risk management.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative and qualitative analysis of dental clinics waste in Zabol city, Iran
    Ebrahimzadeh, Gholam Reza
    Norzaee, Samira
    Djahed, Babak
    Enayat, Ebrahim
    Fakhri, Yadolah
    Taghavi, Mahmoud
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 19 : 1865 - 1870
  • [34] A new flood risk assessment framework for evaluating the effectiveness of policies to improve urban flood resilience
    Hammond, Michael
    Chen, Albert S.
    Batica, Jelena
    Butler, David
    Djordjevic, Slobodan
    Gourbesville, Philippe
    Manojlovic, Natasa
    Mark, Ole
    Veerbeek, William
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (05) : 427 - 436
  • [35] EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT ON QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE YIELD OF SUGAR BEET (BETA VULGARIS L.) IN KARAJ, IRAN
    Mansuri, M.
    Babazadeh, H.
    Emdad, M. R.
    Taleghani, D.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (01): : 455 - 466
  • [36] A resilience assessment method for urban water systems
    Makropoulos, C.
    Nikolopoulos, D.
    Palmen, L.
    Kools, S.
    Segrave, A.
    Vries, D.
    Koop, S.
    van Alphen, H. J.
    Vonk, E.
    van Thienen, P.
    Rozos, E.
    Medema, G.
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (04) : 316 - 328
  • [37] Quantitative assessment of urban flood disaster damages using the S-curve - A case study of Zhengzhou City
    Du, Wei
    Wang, Jia
    Liu, Jiahong
    Wang, Hao
    Zhou, Jinjun
    Mei, Chao
    Nazli, Sana
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2025, 658
  • [38] Aquifer vulnerability assessment using GIS and fuzzy system: a case study in Tehran-Karaj aquifer, Iran
    Mohammadi, Kourosh
    Niknam, Ramin
    Majd, Vahid J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2009, 58 (02): : 437 - 446
  • [39] An urban system perspective on urban flood resilience using SEM: evidence from Nanjing city, China
    Peng Wang
    Yabo Li
    Yuhu Zhang
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 109 : 2575 - 2599
  • [40] An urban system perspective on urban flood resilience using SEM: evidence from Nanjing city, China
    Wang, Peng
    Li, Yabo
    Zhang, Yuhu
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 109 (03) : 2575 - 2599