Unfreezing higher education institutions? Understanding the introduction of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany

被引:0
|
作者
Markus Seyfried
Moritz Ansmann
机构
[1] University of Potsdam,Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Chair for German Politics and Government
[2] University of Potsdam,Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Chair for Political Science, Administration and Organization
来源
Higher Education | 2018年 / 75卷
关键词
Quality management; Organizational change; Higher education; Mixed methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quality management (QM) in teaching and learning has strongly “infected” the higher education sector and spread around the world. It has almost everywhere become an integral part of higher education reforms. While existing research on QM mainly focuses on the national level from a macro-perspective, its introduction at the institutional level is only rarely analyzed. The present article addresses this research gap. Coming from the perspective of organization studies, it examines the factors that were crucial for the introduction of QM at higher education institutions in Germany. As the introduction of QM can be considered to be a process of organizational change, the article refers to Kurt Lewin’s seminal concept of “unfreezing” organizations as a theoretical starting point. Methodologically, a mixed methods approach is applied by combining qualitative data derived from interviews with institutional quality managers and quantitative data gathered from a nationwide survey. The results show that the introduction of QM is initiated by either internal or external processes. Furthermore, some institutions follow a rather voluntary approach of unfreezing, while others show modes of forced unfreezing. Consequently, the way how QM was introduced has important implications for its implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1076
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning Management Systems usage on Higher Education Institutions
    Babo, Rosalina
    Azevedo, Ana
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION IN ADVANCING ECONOMIES-ANALYSES & SOLUTIONS, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 883 - 889
  • [22] Knowledge management and organizational learning in higher education institutions
    Passaillaigue Baquerizo, Roberto
    Estrada Senti, Vivian
    GECONTEC-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE GESTION DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y LA TECNOLOGIA, 2016, 4 (02): : 35 - 43
  • [23] Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education.
    Cox, R
    PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (04) : 682 - 683
  • [24] Understanding digital transformation challenges for online learning and teaching in higher education institutions: a review and research framework
    Sahni, Shalini
    Verma, Sushma
    Kaurav, Rahul Pratap Singh
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [25] Higher education institutions as learning organizations: The quality principles and practices in higher education.
    Freed, JE
    Klugman, MR
    REVIEW OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 21 (02): : 202 - 202
  • [26] Service Quality in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Management and Education Institutions
    Chopra, Rita
    Chawla, Mamta
    Sharma, Tejinder
    NMIMS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 24 : 59 - 72
  • [27] EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITY AND COMPETITIVENESS MANAGEMENT
    Lysokon, Illia
    Barulina, Yuliia
    Zakharova, Hanna
    Vasyliuk, Tamara
    Razmolodchykova, Ivanna
    CADERNOS EDUCACAO TECNOLOGIA E SOCIEDADE, 2024, 17 : 73 - 84
  • [28] Quality in higher education institutions
    Popescu, S.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 171 - 178
  • [29] The use of modern technologies to enhance the quality of teaching at higher education institutions
    Romanyuk, Svitlana
    Maftyn, Larysa
    Iliichuk, Liubomyra
    Vasylyk, Maryna
    Tarangul, Liubov
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2023, 12 (68): : 224 - 235
  • [30] A study on the quantitative analysis and evaluation of teaching quality for higher education institutions
    Pang, Jihong
    Liu, Xiaojing
    World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2013, 11 (02): : 57 - 63