Comparative Study of a Sunspot at Two Different Instances of Time

被引:0
|
作者
Hashem Hamedivafa
机构
[1] Imam Khomeini International University,Physics Department, Faculty of Science
来源
Solar Physics | 2020年 / 295卷
关键词
Sunspots, umbra; Sunspots, statistics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We investigate the evolutionary effects on the brightness of a sunspot as well as on the properties of its fine-structures using two sets of time series of G-band images of a single sunspot in NOAA 10944 recorded at two symmetric locations on the solar disc by Hinode/SOT (Solar Optical Telescope). The second time series (phase W) was recorded 2.5 d after recording the first time series (phase E). Both time series of images were corrected for instrumental stray light; then the p-mode oscillations were removed. Our analysis demonstrates that the spatially and temporally averaged intensities of the umbra as well as the penumbra in both phases are practically the same. Nevertheless, considering only intensities smaller than 1.0Iph\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mbox{I}_{\mathrm{ph}}$\end{document} the penumbra in the phase W is brighter with a contrast of 2 per cent. However, the ratio of the peak intensities of penumbral grains to their background intensities decreases, on average, from 2.9 to 2.6 from phase E to phase W. The penumbra is on average, 6.9 times brighter than the umbra in both phases. The umbra gets smaller in size with a ratio of 0.90 and its magnetic field strength decreases about 200 G after the 2.5 d evolution. Although the central umbral dots (UDs) with lifetimes longer than 2 min are by the factor of 1.6 more frequent in phase E, the most of the physical and kinematic properties of UDs do not show considerable changes after the sunspot evolution at this 2.5 d time interval. The registered UDs have intensities smaller than 0.84Iph\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mbox{I}_{\mathrm{ph}}$\end{document} with a mean intensity of about 0.29Iph\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mbox{I}_{\mathrm{ph}}$\end{document}. The equivalent diameters of the individual UDs have a symmetric distribution around 180 km with a standard deviation about 35 km. The brightest UDs show a constant median diameter. The UDs registered in both phases have a mean lifetime of 7.4 min. Our results suggest that UDs with a certain lifetime have an admissible lower limit for their mean size which grows with lifetime. The proper motions of UDs show velocities less than 1.0kms−1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$1.0~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}$\end{document} with a maximum population around 0.2kms−1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$0.2~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}$\end{document}. The UDs formed in the phase W are faster when the umbral area is smaller and the magnetic field is weaker.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Instrumentation of root canals using two different techniques - Comparative study
    Naigeboren, D
    Bulacio, M
    De la Casa, M
    Leonardi, L
    Costa, L
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (05) : 1115 - 1115
  • [42] Comparative invitro study and biomechanical testing of two different magnesium alloys
    Weizbauer, Andreas
    Modrejewski, Christian
    Behrens, Sabine
    Klein, Helmut
    Helmecke, Patrick
    Seitz, Jan-Marten
    Windhagen, Henning
    Moehwald, Kai
    Reifenrath, Janin
    Waizy, Hazibullah
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 28 (08) : 1264 - 1273
  • [43] Comparative study of two different measuring methods for corona current pulses
    Wang, Zhenguo
    Lu, Tiebing
    Liu, Yang
    Bian, Xingming
    Li, Xuebao
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2017, 88 : 134 - 138
  • [44] Comparative study of two different kinds of school furniture among children
    Troussier, B
    Tesniere, C
    Fauconnier, J
    Grison, J
    Juvin, R
    Phelip, X
    ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (03) : 516 - 526
  • [45] A comparative study between two different suture materials in oral implantology
    Pons-Vicente, Olivia
    Lopez-Jimenez, Lidia
    Angels Sanchez-Garces, Ma
    Sala-Perez, Sergi
    Gay-Escoda, Cosme
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) : 282 - 288
  • [46] Comparative Study of Two Types of Alkali Lignin from Different Origin
    Zhao, Lihong
    Sun, Hongjun
    MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 299-300 : 747 - 750
  • [47] Comparative study of two different rat models of stress urinary incontinence
    Qu, Zhiyu
    Chen, Bingli
    Yang, Mengyi
    Chen, Yuelai
    Ming, Shuren
    Hou, Wenguang
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (12) : 2867 - 2872
  • [48] Comparative study of the nitrification characteristics of two different nitrifier immobilization methods
    Li, Zhirong
    Zhang, Zhi
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Zhenjia
    BIODEGRADATION, 2009, 20 (06) : 859 - 865
  • [49] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOLAR ASSISTED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TWO DIFFERENT CLIMATES
    Montero, Andres
    Lopez-Villada, Jesus
    Naranjo-Mendoza, Carlos
    Labus, Jerko
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, VOL 2, 2014,
  • [50] 'Perceived social citizenship': a comparative study between two different hukous
    Jensen, Birgitte
    CITIZENSHIP STUDIES, 2019, 23 (02) : 172 - 188