Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing

被引:0
|
作者
Keri Carstens
Jennifer Anderson
Pamela Bachman
Adinda De Schrijver
Galen Dively
Brian Federici
Mick Hamer
Marco Gielkens
Peter Jensen
William Lamp
Stefan Rauschen
Geoff Ridley
Jörg Romeis
Annabel Waggoner
机构
[1] Regulatory Science,Department of Entomology
[2] Pioneer Hi-Bred,Department of Entomology
[3] DuPont Agricultural Biotechnology,National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
[4] Monsanto Company,Institute for Biology III (Plant Physiology)
[5] Scientific Institute of Public Health,US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs
[6] University of Maryland,undefined
[7] University of California-Riverside,undefined
[8] Syngenta,undefined
[9] Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre,undefined
[10] Expertise Centre for Substances,undefined
[11] RWTH Aachen University,undefined
[12] Environmental Risk Management Authority,undefined
[13] Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART,undefined
[14] Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division,undefined
来源
Transgenic Research | 2012年 / 21卷
关键词
Environmental risk assessment; Aquatic ecosystem; Non-target organism; Genetically modified crops;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Environmental risk assessments (ERA) support regulatory decisions for the commercial cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops. The ERA for terrestrial agroecosystems is well-developed, whereas guidance for ERA of GM crops in aquatic ecosystems is not as well-defined. The purpose of this document is to demonstrate how comprehensive problem formulation can be used to develop a conceptual model and to identify potential exposure pathways, using Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize as a case study. Within problem formulation, the insecticidal trait, the crop, the receiving environment, and protection goals were characterized, and a conceptual model was developed to identify routes through which aquatic organisms may be exposed to insecticidal proteins in maize tissue. Following a tiered approach for exposure assessment, worst-case exposures were estimated using standardized models, and factors mitigating exposure were described. Based on exposure estimates, shredders were identified as the functional group most likely to be exposed to insecticidal proteins. However, even using worst-case assumptions, the exposure of shredders to Bt maize was low and studies supporting the current risk assessments were deemed adequate. Determining if early tier toxicity studies are necessary to inform the risk assessment for a specific GM crop should be done on a case by case basis, and should be guided by thorough problem formulation and exposure assessment. The processes used to develop the Bt maize case study are intended to serve as a model for performing risk assessments on future traits and crops.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 842
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Assessment of the Effect of Rotenone on Selected Non-Target Aquatic Fauna
    Dalu, Tatenda
    Wasserman, Ryan J.
    Jordaan, Martine
    Froneman, William P.
    Weyl, Olaf L. F.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [42] Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA
    Ahmad, Aqeel
    Negri, Ignacio
    Oliveira, Wladecir
    Brown, Christopher
    Asiimwe, Peter
    Sammons, Bernard
    Horak, Michael
    Jiang, Changjian
    Carson, David
    [J]. TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [43] Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA
    Aqeel Ahmad
    Ignacio Negri
    Wladecir Oliveira
    Christopher Brown
    Peter Asiimwe
    Bernard Sammons
    Michael Horak
    Changjian Jiang
    David Carson
    [J]. Transgenic Research, 2016, 25 : 1 - 17
  • [44] Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants
    Romeis, Joerg
    Hellmich, Richard L.
    Candolfi, Marco P.
    Carstens, Keri
    De Schrijver, Adinda
    Gatehouse, Angharad M. R.
    Herman, Rod A.
    Huesing, Joseph E.
    McLean, Morven A.
    Raybould, Alan
    Shelton, Anthony M.
    Waggoner, Annabel
    [J]. TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [45] Risk assessment of Bt crops on the non-target plant-associated insects and soil organisms
    Yaqoob, Amina
    Shahid, Ahmad Ali
    Samiullah, Tahir Rehman
    Rao, Abdul Qayyum
    Khan, Muhammad Azmat Ullah
    Tahir, Sana
    Mirza, Safdar Ali
    Husnain, Tayyab
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2016, 96 (08) : 2613 - 2619
  • [46] Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants
    Jörg Romeis
    Richard L. Hellmich
    Marco P. Candolfi
    Keri Carstens
    Adinda De Schrijver
    Angharad M. R. Gatehouse
    Rod A. Herman
    Joseph E. Huesing
    Morven A. McLean
    Alan Raybould
    Anthony M. Shelton
    Annabel Waggoner
    [J]. Transgenic Research, 2011, 20 : 1 - 22
  • [47] Assessment of unanticipated unintended effects of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms: a controversy worthy of pursuit?
    Devos, Y.
    Alvarez-Alfageme, F.
    Gennaro, A.
    Mestdagh, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY, 2016, 140 (1-2) : 1 - 10
  • [48] Impact of locust control on non-target arthropods - Environmental monitoring, risk assessment and risk management
    Peveling, R
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE GERMAN SOCIETY FOR GENERAL AND APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY, VOL 12, NOS 1-6, FEB 2000, 1999, 12 (1-6): : 149 - 154
  • [49] Comment on Ervin and Welsh: Environmental effects of genetically modified crops: differentiated risk assessment and management
    Stiekema, WJ
    [J]. Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops, 2005, 7 : 31 - 31
  • [50] Comparative environmental impact assessment of herbicides used on genetically modified and non-genetically modified herbicide-tolerant canola crops using two risk indicators
    Oliver, Danielle P.
    Kookana, Rai S.
    Miller, Rosalind B.
    Correll, Raymond L.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 557 : 754 - 763