The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful

被引:0
|
作者
Gonzalo Génova
Hernán Astudillo
Anabel Fraga
机构
[1] Universidad Carlos III de Madrid,Departamento de Informática
[2] Universidad de Santiago de Chile,Centro de Innovación en Tecnologías de la Información para Aplicaciones Sociales
[3] Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María,Departamento de Informática
来源
关键词
Ethics in scientific publications; Careers in Academia; Research Assessment; Scientometrics; Impact factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article deals with a modern disease of academic science that consists of an enormous increase in the number of scientific publications without a corresponding advance of knowledge. Findings are sliced as thin as salami and submitted to different journals to produce more papers. If we consider academic papers as a kind of scientific ‘currency’ that is backed by gold bullion in the central bank of ‘true’ science, then we are witnessing an article-inflation phenomenon, a scientometric bubble that is most harmful for science and promotes an unethical and antiscientific culture among researchers. The main problem behind the scenes is that the impact factor is used as a proxy for quality. Therefore, not only for convenience, but also based on ethical principles of scientific research, we adhere to the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment when it emphasizes “the need to eliminate the use of journal-based metrics in funding, appointment and promotion considerations; and the need to assess research on its own merits rather on the journal in which the research is published”. Our message is mainly addressed to the funding agencies and universities that award tenures or grants and manage research programmes, especially in developing countries. The message is also addressed to well-established scientists who have the power to change things when they participate in committees for grants and jobs.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 235
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful
    Genova, Gonzalo
    Astudillo, Hernan
    Fraga, Anabel
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2016, 22 (01) : 227 - 235
  • [2] GOTO CONSIDERED HARMFUL CONSIDERED HARMFUL CONSIDERED HARMFUL
    MUSCIANO, C
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1987, 30 (05) : 352 - 352
  • [3] Cloning considered harmful considered harmful
    Kapser, Cory
    Godfrey, Michael W.
    13TH WORKING CONFERENCE ON REVERSE ENGINEERING PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 19 - 28
  • [4] GOTO CONSIDERED HARMFUL CONSIDERED HARMFUL
    RUBIN, F
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1987, 30 (03) : 195 - 196
  • [6] Cloning considered harmful considered harmful: patterns of cloning in software
    Kapser, Cory J.
    Godfrey, Michael W.
    EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2008, 13 (06) : 645 - 692
  • [7] “Cloning considered harmful” considered harmful: patterns of cloning in software
    Cory J. Kapser
    Michael W. Godfrey
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2008, 13
  • [8] Rounding Considered Harmful
    Schurmann, Carsten
    ELECTRONIC VOTING, 2018, 11143 : 189 - 202
  • [9] Prompting Considered Harmful
    Morris, Meredith Ringel
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2024, 67 (12) : 28 - 30
  • [10] Conversation considered harmful?
    Reeves, Stuart
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACES (CUI 2019), 2019,