Simultaneous quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in GMPEs using Gaussian process regression

被引:0
|
作者
Marcel Hermkes
Nicolas M. Kuehn
Carsten Riggelsen
机构
[1] University of Potsdam,Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences
[2] University of California,Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center Organization
来源
关键词
Gaussian Process regression; Epistemic uncertainty; Aleatory variability; Empirical ground–motion models; Bayesian non–parametrics; GMPE; Generalization error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a Bayesian non-parametric method based on Gaussian Process (GP) regression to derive ground-motion models for peak-ground parameters and response spectral ordinates. Due to its non-parametric nature there is no need to specify any fixed functional form as in parametric regression models. A GP defines a distribution over functions, which implicitly expresses the uncertainty over the underlying data generating process. An advantage of GP regression is that it is possible to capture the whole uncertainty involved in ground-motion modeling, both in terms of aleatory variability as well as epistemic uncertainty associated with the underlying functional form and data coverage. The distribution over functions is updated in a Bayesian way by computing the posterior distribution of the GP after observing ground-motion data, which in turn can be used to make predictions. The proposed GP regression models is evaluated on a subset of the RESORCE data base for the SIGMA project. The experiments show that GP models have a better generalization error than a simple parametric regression model. A visual assessment of different scenarios demonstrates that the inferred GP models are physically plausible.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 466
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncertainty Quantification and Optimal Design of EV-WPT System Efficiency based on Adaptive Gaussian Process Regression
    Shang, Xinlei
    Xu, Linlin
    Yu, Quanyi
    Li, Bo
    Lv, Gang
    Chi, Yaodan
    Wang, Tianhao
    [J]. APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2023, 38 (12): : 929 - 940
  • [42] Epistemic uncertainty quantification in flutter analysis using evidence theory
    Jian, Tang
    Wu Zhigang
    Chao, Yang
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2015, 28 (01) : 164 - 171
  • [43] Propagating aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in land cover change prediction process (vol 37, pg 24, 2017)
    Ferchichi, A.
    Boulila, W.
    Farah, I. R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 43 : 231 - 231
  • [44] BIAS MINIMIZATION IN GAUSSIAN PROCESS SURROGATE MODELING FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Hombal, Vadiraj
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2011, 1 (04) : 321 - 349
  • [45] A Gaussian Process Method with Uncertainty Quantification for Air Quality Monitoring
    Wang, Peng
    Mihaylova, Lyudmila
    Chakraborty, Rohit
    Munir, Said
    Mayfield, Martin
    Alam, Khan
    Khokhar, Muhammad Fahim
    Zheng, Zhengkai
    Jiang, Chengxi
    Fang, Hui
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (10)
  • [46] A Novel Dimension Fusion Based Polynomial Chaos Approach for Mixed Aleatory-Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification of Carbon Nanotube Interconnects
    Prasad, Aditi Krishna
    Roy, Sourajeet
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY & SIGNAL/POWER INTEGRITY (EMCSI), 2017, : 108 - 111
  • [47] Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Example analyses from reactor safety and radioactive waste disposal involving the separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty
    Helton, Jon C.
    Johnson, Jay D.
    Sallaberry, Cedric J.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) : 1014 - 1033
  • [48] Uncertainty quantification using martingales for misspecified Gaussian processes
    Neiswanger, Willie
    Ramdas, Aaditya
    [J]. ALGORITHMIC LEARNING THEORY, VOL 132, 2021, 132
  • [49] Machine learning in drug development: Characterizing the effect of 30 drugs on the QT interval using Gaussian process regression, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification
    Costabal, Francisco Sahli
    Matsuno, Kristen
    Yao, Jiang
    Perdikaris, Paris
    Kuhl, Ellen
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 348 : 313 - 333
  • [50] Uncertainty Estimation of the Dose Rate in Real-Time Applications Using Gaussian Process Regression
    Kim, Jinhwan
    Lim, Kyung Taek
    Park, Kyeongjin
    Kim, Yewon
    Cho, Gyuseong
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (10)