Evaluation of the best smartphone model in the market by integrating fuzzy-AHP and PROMETHEE decision-making approach

被引:0
|
作者
Shankha Shubhra Goswami
Dhiren Kumar Behera
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology,Department of Mechanical Engineering
来源
DECISION | 2021年 / 48卷
关键词
MCDM; Smartphone; FAHP; PROMETHEE I; PROMETHEE II; TFN; 61; D81; M11;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Smartphones nowadays have become the most globally demanded electronic devices. Each year, almost thousands of new smartphone models are launched by different brands having diverse specifications and variable price range. Due to the availability of large smartphone quantity in the market, sometimes the buyers get confused about the most appropriate model to buy at low price with respect to descent hardware specifications. This research article states such a type of decision problem and solves it using multi-criteria decision-making techniques that enable the mobile users to select the best smartphone model. The main objective of the study is to choose the best smartphone model among 10 selected models available in the market with the help of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) where FAHP based on trapezoidal fuzzy numbers is used to evaluate the criteria weights and PROMETHEE is used to propose the preference ranking order of the alternatives. Seven important specifications (i.e., criteria), namely price, storage capacity, RAM, battery, screen size, camera and clock speed, are considered based on which the selection procedure is carried out. PROMETHEE I provides the partial alternatives ranking and shows the mode of preference of each model over other models, whereas PROMETHEE II delivers the complete ranking of the alternatives which recommends Realme 5i and Samsung J6 Plus as the best and worst model, respectively, among the group.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 96
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues
    Calabrese, Armando
    Costa, Roberta
    Levialdi, Nathan
    Menichini, Tamara
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 139 : 155 - 168
  • [22] Bidding strategy to support decision-making by integrating fuzzy AHP and regression-based simulation
    Chou, Jui-Sheng
    Anh-Duc Pham
    Wang, Hsin
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 35 : 517 - 527
  • [23] Improvement of the intelligent decision-making model based on AHP-fuzzy method
    Shi, Li
    Wang, Hong
    Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 50 YEARS' ACHIEVEMENTS, FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND SOCIAL IMPACTS, 2006, : 330 - 332
  • [24] Multicriteria decision making taxonomy of code recommendation system challenges: a fuzzy-AHP analysis
    Muhammad Azeem Akbar
    Arif Ali Khan
    Zhiqiu Huang
    Information Technology and Management, 2023, 24 : 115 - 131
  • [25] Multicriteria decision making taxonomy of code recommendation system challenges: a fuzzy-AHP analysis
    Akbar, Muhammad Azeem
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Huang, Zhiqiu
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 24 (02): : 115 - 131
  • [26] A Crime Decision-making Model Based on AHP
    Yan, Feixue
    Xia, Jing
    Shen, Guanqun
    Kang, Xusheng
    INTELLIGENT STRUCTURE AND VIBRATION CONTROL, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 50-51 : 885 - +
  • [27] A Fuzzy-AHP Approach for Strategic Evaluation and Selection of Digital Marketing Tools
    Leung, K. H.
    Mo, Daniel Y.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 1422 - 1426
  • [29] A Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS-Based Group Decision-Making Approach to IT Personnel Selection
    Samanlioglu, Funda
    Taskaya, Yunus Emre
    Gulen, Utku Can
    Cokcan, Ogulcan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (05) : 1576 - 1591
  • [30] A Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS-Based Group Decision-Making Approach to IT Personnel Selection
    Funda Samanlioglu
    Yunus Emre Taskaya
    Utku Can Gulen
    Ogulcan Cokcan
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 : 1576 - 1591