Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? a randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam

被引:13
|
作者
Hisamuddin N. [1 ,3 ]
Rahman N.A. [1 ,3 ]
Hashim A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Consultant and Head of Emergency Medicine, PPSP, USM, Kubang Kerian
[2] Department of Emergency and Trauma, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, USM
关键词
Emergency department; Midazolam; Procedural sedation analgesia; Propofol;
D O I
10.1007/s12245-010-0162-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study examined the safety and effectiveness of the procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) technique carried out in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital over a period of 1 year. The research was done to compare the effectiveness and efficacy of moderate sedation of fentanyl combined with either mid-azolam or propofol for any brief, intense procedure in the ED setting. Aims The objectives were to observe the occurrence of adverse events in subjects undergoing PSA for intense and painful procedures in the emergency department and to implement the use of capnography as a method of monitoring the patients when they were under PSA. Methods Forty patients were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups using the computer-generated random permuted blocks of four patients. Twenty patients were grouped together as group A and the remaining 20 patients as group B. Drugs used were single blinded to prevent any bias. Drug A was propofol and fentanyl, while drug B was midazolam and fentanyl. The procedures involved included orthopedic manipulation such as reduction of fractures, reduction of dislocated joints, abscess drainage, wound debridement, laceration wound repair and cardioversion. All of the subjects were monitored for their vital signs and end tidal carbon dioxide level every 10 min till the PSA was completed. The duration of stay in the ED was documented when the subjects had completed the procedure and were released from the department. Result Of the study population, 75.6% were males. The mean age was 37.8 years (95% CI 33.2, 39.8). None of the patients developed any major complications while under PSA. The vital signs pre-, intra- and post-procedure were not significantly different in either the propofol or miz-adolam groups (p value >0.05). Conclusion This study had proven that there was no difference in adverse event occurrence between the studied drugs during PSA. Propofol can be recommended for use in PSA if the operator is well trained and familiar with the drug. © Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A randomized controlled trial of propofol and midazolam in patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury after neurosurgery
    Zheng, Yun-Cong
    Hsu, Yung-Hsin
    Huang, Yen-Min
    Chen, Pin-Yuan
    Lin, Chih-Lung
    FORMOSAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 57 (04) : 164 - 166
  • [42] Effects of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients: a randomized controlled preliminary trial
    Li, Wei-Xia
    Luo, Ru-Yi
    Chen, Chao
    Li, Xiang
    Ao, Jing-Sheng
    Liu, Yue
    Yin, Yi-Qing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (04) : 437 - 445
  • [43] Comparison of propofol with midazolam in endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
    Ominami, Masaki
    Nagami, Yasuaki
    Shiba, Masatsugu
    Tominaga, Kazunari
    Sakai, Taishi
    Maruyama, Hirotsugu
    Kato, Kunihiro
    Minamino, Hiroaki
    Fukunaga, Shusei
    Tanaka, Fumio
    Sugimori, Satoshi
    Kamata, Noriko
    Machida, Hirohisa
    Yamagami, Hirokazu
    Tanigawa, Tetsuya
    Watanabe, Toshio
    Fujiwara, Yasuhiro
    Arakawa, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 397 - 406
  • [44] A cost-effectiveness analysis of propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Hohl, Corinne Michele
    Nosyk, Bohdan
    Sadatsafavi, Mohsen
    Anis, Aslarn Hayat
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [45] Propofol for premedication in gastroscopies - a randomized comparison to midazolam
    Hofmann, C
    Kiesslich, R
    Brackertz, A
    Jung, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1999, 37 (07): : 589 - 595
  • [46] Propofol use for pediatric procedural sedation in a general emergency department
    Wells, Kimberly
    Steele, Nashley
    Laham, James
    Stephan, Maria
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 50 (07) : 668 - 668
  • [47] Use of propofol sedation in a pediatric emergency department: A prospective study
    Skokan, EG
    Pribble, C
    Bassett, KE
    Nelson, DS
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2001, 40 (12) : 663 - 671
  • [48] Ketamine-Propofol Combination (Ketofol) Versus Propofol Alone for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
    Andolfatto, Gary
    Abu-Laban, Riyad B.
    Zed, Peter J.
    Staniforth, Sean M.
    Stackhouse, Sherry
    Moadebi, Susanne
    Willman, Elaine
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 59 (06) : 504 - 512
  • [49] Propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Dunn, Tamsin
    Mossop, David
    Newton, Alastair
    Gammon, Alison
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (07) : 459 - 461
  • [50] The Safe Use of Propofol Reply
    Worsham, Christopher
    Breu, Anthony C.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (01) : 140 - 140