Evaluation of Geofoam Effects on Seismic Response in Cantilever Retaining Wall

被引:0
|
作者
Rouzbeh Dabiri
Navid Hasanpouri Notash
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Civil Engineering, Tabriz Branch
关键词
Geofoam; Cantilever retaining wall; Seismic response; Numerical model; FLAC 7.0;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the present numerical study, using the finite difference software FLAC (version 7), the effect of EPS geofoam inclusions was investigated on the improvement of the retaining walls response in static and dynamic conditions. In order to evaluate the performance of geofoam inclusions, parameters such as wall height, type of retaining wall (yielding and non-yielding types), density and thickness of geofoam inclusion were studied. Two earthquake records were selected for present research: far-field and near-field. Retaining walls at the heights of 6 and 9 m and two types of EPS geofoam, EPS15 (γ = 0.15 kN/m3) and EPS20 (γ = 0.2 kN/m3), were modeled at relative thicknesses (t/H) of 0.1 and 0.2. According to the results, the isolation efficiency of geofoam inclusion against the forces imposed to the retaining wall, AP, was achieved in static condition more than dynamic condition. In the present study at seismic record of the near-field, EPS geofoam showed a better performance than the far-field record in reduction of lateral forces. Also, the isolation efficiency of geofoam inclusion against the permanent displacement, Ad, and application point of the seismic force to the yielding retaining wall were investigated. The results of the analyses indicate that, geofoam inclusion can reduce seismic lateral forces acting on yielding and non-yielding retaining walls by 40% and 50%, respectively. In addition, isolation efficiency of geofoam inclusion, Ad, for yielding wall may reach values in excess of 40%, depending on peak acceleration amplitude (amax), excitation frequency (f), relative frequency (f/fn), geofoam relative thickness (t/H), and wall height (H).
引用
收藏
页码:2097 / 2116
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of wall flexibility on dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls
    Cakir, Tufan
    [J]. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2014, 49 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [22] Influence of wall flexibility on dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls
    [J]. Cakir, T. (cakirtufan@hotmail.com), 1600, Techno-Press (49):
  • [23] Numerical Investigation of Seismic Behaviour for a Flexible Cantilever Retaining Wall with Cohesive Backfill
    El Yamouni, Bouraida
    El Khannoussi, Fadoua
    Khamlichi, Abdellatif
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH IN AFRICA, 2024, 69 : 125 - 142
  • [24] Recent Experiences with Geofoam Blocks as Retaining Wall Backfill
    Cadden, Allen
    Senior, Michael
    Shull, B. Philip, Jr.
    Stepek, Brendan
    [J]. GEO-CONGRESS 2022: SOIL IMPROVEMENT, GEOSYNTHETICS, AND INNOVATIVE GEOMATERIALS, 2022, 331 : 531 - 542
  • [25] Computation of seismic translational and rotational displacements of cantilever retaining wall with shear key
    Jadhav, Prajakta R.
    Prashant, Amit
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 130
  • [26] Effect of fabric anisotropy on seismic response of a retaining wall
    Zeng, X.
    Li, B.
    Min, H.
    [J]. PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2010, : 517 - 522
  • [27] Lateral earth pressures on flexible cantilever retaining walls with deformable geofoam inclusions
    Ertugrul, Ozgur L.
    Trandafir, Aurelian C.
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2013, 158 : 23 - 33
  • [28] Seismic Response of Mechanically Stabilised Earth Retaining Wall
    Joseph, M.
    Banerjee, S.
    [J]. 14TH BALTIC SEA REGION GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE, 2021, 727
  • [29] BEHAVIOR OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL - CLOSURE
    GOH, ATC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (02): : 237 - 238
  • [30] BEHAVIOR OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL - DISCUSSION
    DAY, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (02): : 237 - 237