Rethinking prestige bias

被引:0
|
作者
Azita Chellappoo
机构
[1] University of Cambridge,Department of History and Philosophy of Science
来源
Synthese | 2021年 / 198卷
关键词
Cultural evolution; Prestige; Bias; Cognition; Social learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Some cultural evolution researchers have argued for the importance of prestige bias as a systematic and widespread social learning bias, that structures human social learning and cultural transmission patterns. Broadly speaking, prestige bias accounts understand it as a bias towards copying ‘prestigious’ individuals (which are typically described as high-status, due to a high level of skill or success in a socially valued domain, and so are treated by others with respect and deference). Prestige bias, along with other social learning biases, has been argued to pay a crucial role in allowing cumulative cultural selection to take place, thereby generating adaptations that are key to our success as a species. However, I argue for skepticism about the plausibility and scope of a prestige bias account. I argue that although an account of prestige bias seems plausible or compelling on their face, it is committed to a particular view of the cognition underpinning the bias, and therefore to predictions regarding its flexibility and context-sensitivity. Given this, current empirical evidence gives us reason to doubt the explanatory value of a prestige bias account over a naive, goal-directed agent account. Additionally, the way that prestige is defined in empirical work is in tension with a general understanding of prestige, casting doubt upon its status as evidence of prestige bias. I examine two studies cited as evidence of prestige bias, arguing that in these cases we cannot clearly favour a prestige bias explanation over a goal-directed agent explanation.
引用
收藏
页码:8191 / 8212
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Prestige bias drives the viral spread of content reposted by influencers in online communities
    Takuro Niitsuma
    Mitsuo Yoshida
    Hideaki Tamori
    Yo Nakawake
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [23] Rethinking Content and Style: Exploring Bias for Unsupervised Disentanglement
    Ren, Xuanchi
    Yang, Tao
    Wang, Yuwang
    Zeng, Wenjun
    2021 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION WORKSHOPS (ICCVW 2021), 2021, : 1823 - 1832
  • [24] Whither the Neutral Agency? Rethinking Bias in Regulatory Administration
    Rodriguez, Daniel B.
    BUFFALO LAW REVIEW, 2021, 69 (02): : 375 - 484
  • [25] Rethinking Metadynamics: From Bias Potentials to Probability Distributions
    Invernizzi, Michele
    Parrinello, Michele
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2020, 11 (07): : 2731 - 2736
  • [26] Bias in Stroke Evaluation: Rethinking the Cookie Theft Picture
    Steinberg, Amy
    Lyden, Patrick D.
    Davis, Arielle P.
    STROKE, 2022, 53 (06) : 2123 - 2125
  • [28] Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Daniel, Hans-Dieter
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2006, 15 (03) : 209 - 219
  • [29] Effects of temporal bias on the assessment of an ecological perturbation: a case study of the Prestige oil spill
    Aragon, Pedro
    Sanchez-Fernandez, David
    Abellan, Pedro
    Varela, Sara
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [30] Context dependent preferences in prestige bias learning about vaccination in rural Namibian pastoralists
    Prall, Sean
    Scelza, Brooke
    Davis, Helen Elizabeth
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2024, 362