Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse U.S. Sample

被引:0
|
作者
Emily Graybill
Andrew Roach
Brian Barger
机构
[1] Georgia State University,School of Public Health, Center for Leadership in Disability
[2] Georgia State University,Counseling and Psychological Services
关键词
Strengths and difficulties questionnaire; Externalizing; Internalizing; Child mental health; Mental health screening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used mental health screening instrument developed in the United Kingdom that measures five proposed factors. U.S. research, however, historically supports a slightly different three-factor solution. The present study reports results using both principal factor analysis (PFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from multiple waves of an ongoing mental health project in middle school aged children. PFA analyses suggested three, five and six-factor solutions with substantial cross-loadings from items. CFAs showed alternative five and six-factor solutions fit well when items guided by the initial PFA were allowed to cross-load. Neither the original five-factor nor popular three-factor models fit well without allowing cross-loading items. These data suggest that popular SDQ three and five-factor model may have variable fit in certain U.S. populations.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse US Sample
    Graybill, Emily
    Roach, Andrew
    Barger, Brian
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2021, 43 (02) : 388 - 398
  • [2] Factor analysis of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of children with intellectual disability
    Haynes, Allison
    Gilmore, Linda
    Shochet, Ian
    Campbell, Marilyn
    Roberts, Clare
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 34 (02) : 847 - 854
  • [3] The self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in an Austrian field sample
    Altendorfer-Kling, Ulrike
    Ardelt-Gattinger, Elisabeth
    Thun-Hohenstein, Leonhard
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDER-UND JUGENDPSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2007, 35 (04): : 265 - 271
  • [4] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the Factor Structure and Scale Validation in U.S. Adolescents
    Jian-Ping He
    Marcy Burstein
    Anja Schmitz
    Kathleen R. Merikangas
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2013, 41 : 583 - 595
  • [5] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the Factor Structure and Scale Validation in U.S. Adolescents
    He, Jian-Ping
    Burstein, Marcy
    Schmitz, Anja
    Merikangas, Kathleen R.
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (04) : 583 - 595
  • [6] Confirmatory factor analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire
    Percy, Andrew
    McCrystal, Patrick
    Higgins, Kathryn
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2008, 24 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [7] Age Appropriateness of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Black, Louise
    Mansfield, Rosie
    Panayiotou, Margarita
    ASSESSMENT, 2021, 28 (06) : 1556 - 1569
  • [8] The German Self-Report Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu-S): Psychometric Properties, Factor Structure, and Critical Values
    Lohbeck, Annette
    Schultheiss, Jan
    Petermann, Franz
    Petermann, Ulrike
    DIAGNOSTICA, 2015, 61 (04): : 222 - 235
  • [9] THE FARSI VERSION OF THE STRENGTH AND DIFFICULTIES QUESTIONNAIRE SELF-REPORT FORM: THE NORMATIVE DATA AND SCALE PROPERTIES
    Alavi, A.
    Mohammadi, M. R.
    Mahmoudi, J.
    Tehranidoost, M.
    Shahrivar, Z.
    Saadat, S.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2009, 3 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [10] Validity of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Yemen
    Almaqrami, MH
    Shuwail, AY
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (05) : 592 - 601