Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities

被引:0
|
作者
Natalia Maloshonok
Evgeniia Shmeleva
机构
[1] National Research University Higher School of Economics,Centre for Sociology of Higher Education, The Institute of Education
来源
关键词
Academic dishonesty; Theory of planned behaviour; Undergraduate students; Russian universities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Student academic dishonesty is a pervasive problem for universities all over the world. The development of innovative practices and interventions for decreasing dishonest behaviour requires understanding factors influencing academic dishonesty. Previous research showed that personal, environmental, and situational factors affect dishonest behaviour at a university. The set of factors and the strength of their influence can differ across countries. There is a lack of research on factors affecting student dishonesty in Russia. A sample of 15,159 undergraduate students from eight Russian highly selective universities was surveyed to understand what factors influence their decision to engage in dishonest behaviour. Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was employed to explain dishonest behaviour among students. The explained variance in the engagement in academic dishonesty equals 48% in the model for the full sample, and reaches 69% in the model for one of the considered institutions. The major findings of this study were: (1) subjective norms appeared to dominate as the strongest predictor of academic dishonesty across the Russian universities; (2) perceived behavioural control, appeared to be positively related to the dishonest behaviour. In the majority of universities, this factor was found to be insignificant. This finding indicates a specific feature of Russian students’ an ethical decision-making process discussed in the last part of the paper.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:313 / 329
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among undergraduate students in online and face-to-face courses
    Peled, Yehuda
    Eshet, Yovav
    Barczyk, Casimir
    Grinautski, Keren
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 131 : 49 - 59
  • [12] Academic dishonesty among high school students
    McCabe, DL
    ADOLESCENCE, 1999, 34 (136) : 681 - 687
  • [13] ACADEMIC DISHONESTY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA: TYPES AND INFLUENCING FACTORS
    Garcia, C.
    Barrada, J. R.
    Lopez-Crespo, G.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 4928 - 4928
  • [14] THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT GOALS, WILLINGNESS TO REPORT ACADEMIC DISHONESTY, AND ENGAGING IN ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
    Huang, Chiao-Ling
    Yang, Shu Ching
    Chen, An-Sing
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2015, 43 (01): : 27 - 37
  • [15] Predicting the Underlying Factors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduates in Public Universities: A Path Analysis Approach
    Imran A.M.
    Nordin M.S.
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2013, 11 (2) : 103 - 120
  • [16] Factors influencing use of bicycle helmets among undergraduate students
    Coron, J
    McLaughlin, G
    Dorman, SM
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 1996, 44 (06) : 294 - 297
  • [17] Undergraduate Academic Dishonesty: What Students Really Think is "Bad" Behavior
    Greenberg, Hollis J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION (SIGITE'17), 2017, : 63 - 63
  • [18] Academic dishonesty among health science school students
    Oran, Nazan Tuna
    Can, Hafize Ozturk
    Senol, Selmin
    Hadimli, Aytul Pelik
    NURSING ETHICS, 2016, 23 (08) : 919 - 931
  • [19] Exploring the types and reasons of internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students:: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS)
    Akbulut, Yavuz
    Sendag, Serkan
    Birinci, Guerkay
    Kilicer, Kerem
    Sahin, Mehmet C.
    Odabasi, Hatice F.
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 51 (01) : 463 - 473
  • [20] Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Students A Contemporary View
    McClung, Emily L.
    Gaberson, Kathleen B.
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2021, 46 (02) : 111 - 115