Ethics in Neuroscience Curricula: A Survey of Australia, Canada, Germany, the UK, and the US

被引:0
|
作者
Gerald Walther
机构
[1] University of Bradford,Bradford Disarmament Research Centre, Division of Peace Studies, School of Social and International Studies
来源
Neuroethics | 2013年 / 6卷
关键词
Education; Ethics; Survey; Neuroscience; Dual-use; Universities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyses ethical training in neuroscience curricula at universities in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom. The main findings are that 52 % of all courses have ethical training available, while in 82 % of those cases, the training is mandatory. In terms of specific contents of the teaching, ethical issues about ‘animal subjects and human participation in research’, ‘scientific misconduct’, and ‘treatment of data’ were the most prominent. A special emphasis during the research was placed on the prevalence of dual-use bioethics. In total, only 3 % of all courses mention it in any of their modules. One of the major findings of the survey was the trend towards ‘mainstreaming’ ethics education particularly in the UK, which is to disperse ethics among the various modules within the education instead of relying on a single ethics module. The paper discusses the utility of this approach for science education as well as describes the overall difficulties that course coordinators face when trying to teach ethics based on the responses to the qualitative part to the survey.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 351
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Geriatric-related topics in the curricula of colleges of pharmacy in the US and Canada.
    Beizer, JL
    Delafuente, JC
    McClure, K
    Miller, SW
    Plein, JB
    Sgritta, M
    Wahler, RG
    Wizwer, P
    Babington, MA
    Porter, CS
    D'Antonio, PM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (04) : S196 - S196
  • [43] How mutually recognizable is mutual recognition? An international terminology index of research ethics review policies in the USA, Canada, UK and Australia
    Rahimzadeh, Vasiliki
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (02) : 101 - 105
  • [44] Norms, institutions and freedom of speech in the US, the UK and Australia
    Gelber, Katharine
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 41 (02) : 209 - 227
  • [45] Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
    Slowther, Anne Marie
    McClimans, Leah
    Price, Charlotte
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 38 (04) : 210 - 214
  • [46] Ethics committees in Germany: An empirical survey of Christian hospitals
    Simon A.
    HEC Forum, 2001, 13 (3) : 225 - 231
  • [47] Paediatric clinical ethics in Australia and New Zealand: a survey
    Cottle, Emma
    Jansen, Melanie
    Irving, Helen
    Mathews, Ben
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2017, 1 (01)
  • [48] REVIEWING THE REVIEWERS - A SURVEY OF INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEES IN AUSTRALIA
    MCNEILL, PM
    BERGLUND, CA
    WEBSTER, IW
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1990, 152 (06) : 289 - &
  • [49] A Comprehensive Survey of Preclinical Microbiology Curricula Among US Medical Schools
    Melber, Dora J.
    Teherani, Arianne
    Schwartz, Brian S.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 63 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [50] Exploring environmental sustainability in UK and US dental curricula and related barriers and enablers: a cross-sectional survey in two dental schools
    Joury, Easter
    Lee, Jennifer
    Parchure, Ashwini
    Mortimer, Frances
    Park, Sang
    Pine, Cynthia
    Ramasubbu, Darshini
    Hillman, Linda
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021, 230 (09) : 605 - 610