The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Emily C. Heberlein
Amy H. Picklesimer
Deborah L. Billings
Sarah Covington-Kolb
Naomi Farber
Edward A. Frongillo
机构
[1] Clemson University,Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health, Education, and Human Development
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Greenville Health System
[3] University of South Carolina,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health
[4] University of South Carolina,College of Social Work
来源
关键词
Prenatal care; Group prenatal care; CenteringPregnancy; Pregnancy-related distress; Prenatal coping; Psychosocial outcomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the psychosocial outcomes of the CenteringPregnancy (CP) model of group prenatal care to individual prenatal care, we conducted a prospective cohort study of women who chose CP group (N = 124) or individual prenatal care (N = 124). Study participants completed the first survey at study recruitment (mean gestational age 12.5 weeks), with 89 % completing the second survey (mean gestational age 32.7 weeks) and 84 % completing the third survey (6 weeks’ postpartum). Multiple linear regression models compared changes by prenatal care model in pregnancy-specific distress, prenatal planning-preparation and avoidance coping, perceived stress, affect and depressive symptoms, pregnancy-related empowerment, and postpartum maternal-infant attachment and maternal functioning. Using intention-to-treat models, group prenatal care participants demonstrated a 3.2 point greater increase (p < 0.05) in their use of prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies. While group participants did not demonstrate significantly greater positive outcomes in other measures, women who were at greater psychosocial risk benefitted from participation in group prenatal care. Among women reporting inadequate social support in early pregnancy, group participants demonstrated a 2.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.03) in pregnancy-specific distress in late pregnancy and 5.6 point higher mean maternal functioning scores postpartum (p = 0.03). Among women with high pregnancy-specific distress in early pregnancy, group participants had an 8.3 point greater increase (p < 0.01) in prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies in late pregnancy and a 4.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.02) in postpartum depressive symptom scores. This study provides further evidence that group prenatal care positively impacts the psychosocial well-being of women with greater stress or lower personal coping resources. Large randomized studies are needed to establish conclusively the biological and psychosocial benefits of group prenatal care for all women.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of multidisciplinary prenatal care and delivery mode on gastroschisis outcomes
    Synder, Christopher W.
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Brinson, Phillip
    Barnes, Leandra A.
    Bartle, Donna T.
    Georgeson, Keith E.
    Muensterer, Oliver J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2011, 46 (01) : 86 - 89
  • [32] Postpartum outcomes of a pilot prenatal care-based psychosocial intervention for PTSD during pregnancy
    Weinreb, Linda
    Wenz-Gross, Melodie
    Upshur, Carole
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 21 (03) : 299 - 312
  • [33] Postpartum outcomes of a pilot prenatal care-based psychosocial intervention for PTSD during pregnancy
    Linda Weinreb
    Melodie Wenz-Gross
    Carole Upshur
    [J]. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2018, 21 : 299 - 312
  • [34] Mechanisms underlying the effects of prenatal psychosocial stress on child outcomes: beyond the HPA axis
    Beijers, Roseriet
    Buitelaar, Jan K.
    de Weerth, Carolina
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 23 (10) : 943 - 956
  • [35] CenteringPregnancy: Group Prenatal Care
    Stemig, Cari
    [J]. CREATIVE NURSING, 2008, 14 (04) : 182 - 183
  • [36] Mechanisms underlying the effects of prenatal psychosocial stress on child outcomes: beyond the HPA axis
    Roseriet Beijers
    Jan K. Buitelaar
    Carolina de Weerth
    [J]. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2014, 23 : 943 - 956
  • [37] Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community
    Jones, Talitha H.
    Crump, William J.
    Foster, Shannon M.
    Mullins, Samantha J.
    Farris, Alicia N.
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2023, 27 (04) : 575 - 581
  • [38] Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community
    Talitha H. Jones
    William J. Crump
    Shannon M. Foster
    Samantha J. Mullins
    Alicia N. Farris
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2023, 27 : 575 - 581
  • [39] The contribution of group prenatal care to maternal psychological health outcomes: A systematic review
    Buultjens, Melissa
    Farouque, Ambereen
    Karimi, Leila
    Whitby, Linda
    Milgrom, Jeannette
    Erbas, Bircan
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (06) : E631 - E642
  • [40] Retrospective Review of Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes in a Group of Uninsured Pregnant Women
    Jarvis, Catherine
    Munoz, Marie
    Graves, Lisa
    Stephenson, Randolph
    D'Souza, Vinita
    Jimenez, Vania
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2011, 33 (03) : 235 - 243