The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Emily C. Heberlein
Amy H. Picklesimer
Deborah L. Billings
Sarah Covington-Kolb
Naomi Farber
Edward A. Frongillo
机构
[1] Clemson University,Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health, Education, and Human Development
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Greenville Health System
[3] University of South Carolina,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health
[4] University of South Carolina,College of Social Work
来源
关键词
Prenatal care; Group prenatal care; CenteringPregnancy; Pregnancy-related distress; Prenatal coping; Psychosocial outcomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the psychosocial outcomes of the CenteringPregnancy (CP) model of group prenatal care to individual prenatal care, we conducted a prospective cohort study of women who chose CP group (N = 124) or individual prenatal care (N = 124). Study participants completed the first survey at study recruitment (mean gestational age 12.5 weeks), with 89 % completing the second survey (mean gestational age 32.7 weeks) and 84 % completing the third survey (6 weeks’ postpartum). Multiple linear regression models compared changes by prenatal care model in pregnancy-specific distress, prenatal planning-preparation and avoidance coping, perceived stress, affect and depressive symptoms, pregnancy-related empowerment, and postpartum maternal-infant attachment and maternal functioning. Using intention-to-treat models, group prenatal care participants demonstrated a 3.2 point greater increase (p < 0.05) in their use of prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies. While group participants did not demonstrate significantly greater positive outcomes in other measures, women who were at greater psychosocial risk benefitted from participation in group prenatal care. Among women reporting inadequate social support in early pregnancy, group participants demonstrated a 2.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.03) in pregnancy-specific distress in late pregnancy and 5.6 point higher mean maternal functioning scores postpartum (p = 0.03). Among women with high pregnancy-specific distress in early pregnancy, group participants had an 8.3 point greater increase (p < 0.01) in prenatal planning-preparation coping strategies in late pregnancy and a 4.9 point greater decrease (p = 0.02) in postpartum depressive symptom scores. This study provides further evidence that group prenatal care positively impacts the psychosocial well-being of women with greater stress or lower personal coping resources. Large randomized studies are needed to establish conclusively the biological and psychosocial benefits of group prenatal care for all women.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes
    Heberlein, Emily C.
    Picklesimer, Amy H.
    Billings, Deborah L.
    Covington-Kolb, Sarah
    Farber, Naomi
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 259 - 269
  • [2] Psychosocial outcomes of group prenatal care
    Emily Boothe
    Marta Olenderek
    M. Cristina Noyola
    Julia Rushing
    Erinn Allred
    Sebastian Kaplan
    [J]. Journal of Public Health, 2022, 30 : 1373 - 1380
  • [3] Psychosocial outcomes of group prenatal care
    Boothe, Emily
    Olenderek, Marta
    Noyola, M. Cristina
    Rushing, Julia
    Allred, Erinn
    Kaplan, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 30 (06): : 1373 - 1380
  • [4] Effects of CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care on Breastfeeding Outcomes
    Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
    Steinka-Fry, Katarzyna T.
    Lipsey, Mark W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 58 (04) : 389 - 395
  • [5] Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes
    Smith, Jessica C.
    Heberlein, Emily C.
    Domingue, Amber
    Laboy, Ana
    Britt, Jessica
    Crockett, Amy H.
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2023, 52` (06): : 467 - 480
  • [6] Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes
    Novick, Gina
    Reid, Allecia E.
    Lewis, Jessica
    Kershaw, Trace S.
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (02) : 112.e1 - 112.e6
  • [7] Group Prenatal Care: Model Fidelity and Outcomes
    Novick, Gina
    Reid, Allecia E.
    Lewis, Jessica
    Kershaw, Trace
    Rising, Sharon S.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 58 (05) : 586 - 586
  • [8] Group Multimodal Prenatal Care and Postpartum Outcomes
    Avalos, Lyndsay A.
    Oberman, Nina
    Gomez, Lizeth
    Quesenberry, Charles P.
    Sinclair, Fiona
    Kurtovich, Elaine
    Gunderson, Erica P.
    Hedderson, Monique M.
    Stark, Joanna
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05)
  • [9] Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: Results from a randomised controlled trial
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    Reed, Elizabeth
    Magriples, Urania
    Westdahl, Claire
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Kershaw, Trace S.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (02) : 235 - 250
  • [10] Effects of a Multi-site Expansion of Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes
    Amy H. Crockett
    Emily C. Heberlein
    Jessica C. Smith
    Pelin Ozluk
    Sarah Covington-Kolb
    Carla Willis
    [J]. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2019, 23 : 1424 - 1433