Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure

被引:0
|
作者
Feifei Zhao
Qingling Yang
Senlin Shi
Xiaoyan Luo
Yingpu Sun
机构
[1] Reproductive Medical Center,
[2] First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous studies have shown that both density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and swim up (SU) procedures can select spermatozoa with longer telomeres for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). However, it is unknown which approach is more effective. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of these two methods on sperm telomere length (STL). A total of 150 normozoospermic subjects were recruited. STL, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), reactive oxygen species (ROS) content and progressive motility of semen samples were detected before and after the procedures of DGC and SU. When compared to raw semen, the average length of sperm telomeres was significantly longer after the two sperm preparation methods. However, no significant difference was found between the DGC and SU procedures. We also found that semen prepared by the two methods had lower DNA fragmentation, ROS content and sperm progressive motility. However, no significant difference was found in those parameters between the two procedures. This is the first study that compares the effects of the DGC and SU procedures on STL, and the results show that both methods can recover a sperm population with longer STL and better DNA integrity for ART.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Elimination of bacteria from human semen during sperm preparation using density gradient centrifugation with a novel tube insert
    Fourie, J.
    Loskutoff, N.
    Huyser, C.
    ANDROLOGIA, 2012, 44 : 513 - 517
  • [42] IVF chamber versus swim up for semen preparation in cases of IVF
    Assaf, A
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 : 317 - 318
  • [43] Re: Microfluidic Sorting Selects Sperm for Clinical Use with Reduced DNA Damage Compared to Density Gradient Centrifugation with Swim-up in Split Semen Samples Editorial Comment
    Niederberger, Craig
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (02): : 215 - 216
  • [44] Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
    Stefania Luppi
    Monica Martinelli
    Elisa Giacomini
    Elena Giolo
    Gabriella Zito
    Rodolfo C Garcia
    Giuseppe Ricci
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 13
  • [45] Density gradient centrifugation and swim-up for ICSI: useful, unsafe, or just unsuitable?
    Hamilton De Martin
    Eduardo P. Miranda
    Marcello S. Cocuzza
    Pedro A. A. Monteleone
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2019, 36 : 2421 - 2423
  • [46] Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation
    Luppi, Stefania
    Martinelli, Monica
    Giacomini, Elisa
    Giolo, Elena
    Zito, Gabriella
    Garcia, Rodolfo C.
    Ricci, Giuseppe
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [47] Density gradient centrifugation and swim-up for ICSI: useful, unsafe, or just unsuitable?
    De Martin, Hamilton
    Miranda, Eduardo P.
    Cocuzza, Marcello S.
    Monteleone, Pedro A. A.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2019, 36 (12) : 2421 - 2423
  • [48] Comparison of two sperm processing techniques for low complexity assisted fertilization: sperm washing followed by swim-up and discontinuous density gradient centrifugation
    Facio, Cassio L.
    Previato, Ligia F.
    Machado-Paula, Ligiane A.
    Matheus, Paulo C. S.
    Araujo Filho, Edilberto
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2016, 20 (04): : 206 - 211
  • [49] SPERM PREPARATION - SWIM UP, DENSITY GRADIENT, MICROFLUIDIC SPERM SORTER METHOD & MAGNETICACTIVATED CELL SORTING METHOD - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Ganesan, Balachandran Sivaraja
    Govindarajan, Sumathy
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 517 - 522
  • [50] Sperm processing by swim-up and density gradient is effective in elimination of sperm with DNA damage
    Jayaraman, Varshini
    Upadhya, Dinesh
    Narayan, Pratap Kumar
    Adiga, Satish Kumar
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2012, 29 (06) : 557 - 563