Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets

被引:0
|
作者
Haigen Xu
Yun Cao
Dandan Yu
Mingchang Cao
Yuxiao He
Michael Gill
Henrique M. Pereira
机构
[1] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China,Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences
[2] NatureServe,Institute of Biology
[3] German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig,CIBIO (Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources)–InBIO (Research Network in Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology)
[4] Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg,undefined
[5] Universidade do Porto,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biodiversity underpins the fundamental elements for human well-being including food security, human health and access to clean water. In 2010, the Aichi Targets were adopted by world leaders to address the crisis of biodiversity loss. Despite conservation efforts, none of the Aichi Targets have been fully met. However, comprehensive analysis of the reasons for failure in terms of implementation mechanisms is, to date, rare and limited in scope. Here, we demonstrate that most parties did not set effective national targets in accordance with the Aichi Targets, and investments, knowledge and accountability for biodiversity conservation have been inadequate to enable effective implementation. We recommend that the new global targets under the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework should be adopted by parties as the minimum national targets to achieve the 2050 Vision. We propose that financial resources for biodiversity conservation are substantially increased through a variety of sources, including the deployment of new economic instruments such as payments for ecosystem services. In addition, science–policy interfaces at all levels need to be strengthened to integrate scientific, Indigenous and local knowledge to support decision-making. We suggest that a compliance and accountability mechanism, based on monitoring systems, is created to provide transparent and credible review of parties’ implementation of the new global targets.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 418
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effective priorities for the expansion of global terrestrial protected areas: Setting post-2020 global and national targets
    Yang, Rui
    Cao, Yue
    Hou, Shuyu
    Peng, Qinyi
    Wang, Xiaoshan
    Wang, Fangyi
    Tseng, Tz-Hsuan
    Yu, Le
    Carver, Steve
    Convery, Ian
    Zhao, Zhicong
    Shen, Xiaoli
    Li, Sheng
    Zheng, Yaomin
    Liu, Han
    Gong, Peng
    Ma, Keping
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (37)
  • [22] Potential wilderness loss could undermine the post-2020 global biodiversity framework
    Cao, Yue
    Tseng, Tz-Hsuan
    Wang, Fangyi
    Jacobson, Andrew
    Yu, Le
    Zhao, Jianqiao
    Carver, Steve
    Locke, Harvey
    Zhao, Zhicong
    Yang, Rui
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 275
  • [23] Five Steps to Inject Transformative Change into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
    Grumbine, R. Edward
    Xu, Jianchu
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2021, 71 (06) : 637 - 646
  • [24] Actions on sustainable food production and consumption for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework
    Delabre, Izabela
    Rodriguez, Lily O.
    Smallwood, Joanna Miller
    Scharlemann, Jorn P. W.
    Alcamo, Joseph
    Antonarakis, Alexander S.
    Rowhani, Pedram
    Hazell, Richard J.
    Aksnes, Dag L.
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Lundquist, Carolyn J.
    Gresham, Charlotte
    Alexander, Anthony E.
    Stenseth, Nils C.
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2021, 7 (12)
  • [25] An Urgent Call to Integrate the Health Sector into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
    King, Simon
    Lemieux, Christopher J.
    Lem, Melissa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [26] Neutral theory reveals the challenge of bending the curve for the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
    Buschke, Falko T.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (20): : 13678 - 13683
  • [27] Reducing pollution to levels not harming biodiversity and ecosystem functions: A perspective on the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
    Feckler, Alexander
    Wolfram, Jakob
    Schulz, Ralf
    Bundschuh, Mirco
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2023, 35
  • [28] Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework
    Armitage, Derek
    Mbatha, Philile
    Muhl, Ella-Kari
    Rice, Wayne
    Sowman, Merle
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (02)
  • [29] Enhancing synergies between action on ocean acidification and the post-2020 global biodiversity framework
    Harrould-Kolieb, Ellycia
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (02) : 548 - 558
  • [30] Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework
    Nicholson, Emily
    Watermeyer, Kate E.
    Rowland, Jessica A.
    Sato, Chloe F.
    Stevenson, Simone L.
    Andrade, Angela
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Cheng, Su-Ting
    Grantham, Hedley S.
    Hill, Samantha L.
    Keith, David A.
    Maron, Martine
    Metzke, Daniel
    Murray, Nicholas J.
    Nelson, Cara R.
    Obura, David
    Plumptre, Andy
    Skowno, Andrew L.
    Watson, James E. M.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2021, 5 (10) : 1338 - 1349