Optimizing modern family size: Trade-offs between fertility and the economic costs of reproduction

被引:0
|
作者
Lawson D.W. [1 ]
Mace R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1B 3DP
[2] Department of Anthropology, University College London, London
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
ALSPAC; Demographic transition; Parental investment; Sibling competition;
D O I
10.1007/s12110-010-9080-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Modern industrialized populations lack the strong positive correlations between wealth and reproductive success that characterize most traditional societies. While modernization has brought about substantial increases in personal wealth, fertility in many developed countries has plummeted to the lowest levels in recorded human history. These phenomena contradict evolutionary and economic models of the family that assume increasing wealth reduces resource competition between offspring, favoring high fertility norms. Here, we review the hypothesis that cultural modernization may in fact establish unusually intense reproductive trade-offs in wealthy relative to impoverished strata, favoring low fertility. We test this premise with British longitudinal data (the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children), exploring maternal self-perceptions of economic hardship in relation to increasing family size and actual socioeconomic status. Low-income and low-education-level mothers perceived the greatest economic costs associated with raising two versus one offspring. However, for all further increases to family size, reproduction appears most expensive for relatively wealthy and well-educated mothers. We discuss our results and review current literature on the long-term consequences of resource dilution in modern families. © 2010 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 61
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection
    Nieminen, Eini
    Kareksela, Santtu
    Halme, Panu
    Kotiaho, Janne Sakari
    [J]. AMBIO, 2021, 50 (10) : 1841 - 1850
  • [32] Metal tolerance and hyperaccumulation: Costs and trade-offs between traits and environment
    Maestri, Elena
    Marmiroli, Marta
    Visioli, Giovanna
    Marmiroli, Nelson
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 68 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [33] Strategic reasoning under trade-offs between action costs and advantages
    Mussi, S
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 1997, 9 (06) : 923 - 940
  • [34] Context and Trade-offs in Family Medicine
    Seehusen, Dean A.
    Bowman, Marjorie A.
    Neale, Anne Victoria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (04) : 433 - 436
  • [35] Costs and trade-offs associated with induced resistance
    Walters, Dale
    Heil, Martin
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2007, 71 (1-3) : 3 - 17
  • [36] Synergies and trade-offs between governance and costs in electricity system transition
    Trutnevyte, Evelina
    Strachan, Neil
    Dodds, Paul E.
    Pudjianto, Danny
    Strbac, Goran
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 : 170 - 181
  • [37] Fitness costs and trade-offs in plant disease
    Brown, J. K. M.
    Andrivon, D.
    Collinge, D. B.
    Nicholson, P.
    [J]. PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2013, 62 : 1 - 1
  • [38] Costs and trade-offs in achieving customer satisfaction
    McNulty, S
    [J]. 2001 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY SUMMER MEETING, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 528 - 529
  • [39] Trade-offs in ecoimmunology: Costs for individuals and populations
    French, S. S.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 57 : E265 - E265
  • [40] Reproduction and immunity trade-offs constrain mating signals and nuptial gift size in a bushcricket
    Barbosa, Flavia
    Rebar, Darren
    Greenfield, Michael D.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) : 109 - 117