Differences in refuge function for prey and tolerance to crayfish among macrophyte species

被引:0
|
作者
Masaaki Sato
Shota Nishijima
Tadashi Miyashita
机构
[1] Hokkaido University,Graduate School of Environmental Science
[2] The University of Tokyo,Laboratory of Biodiversity Science, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences
来源
Limnology | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
Invasive species; Crayfish; Macrophyte; Refuge; Aquatic insect;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii is an omnivore and an ecosystem engineer whose feeding mechanism has reduced the abundance of many native invertebrates and macrophytes. Since macrophytes provide refuges for aquatic insects, macrophyte depletion by crayfish might have indirect negative effects on animal prey in aquatic habitats. We postulated that the prey refuges provided by macrophytes and macrophyte tolerance to crayfish cutting and feeding vary among macrophyte species. We conducted two experiments to (1) investigate differences in macrophyte refuge function for dragonfly larvae against crayfish, and (2) test the tolerance to crayfish cutting and feeding among macrophyte species. Elodea nuttallii (submerged plant), Potamogeton crispus (submerged plant), and Carex idzuroei (emergent plant) had greater refuge effects than Trapa japonica (floating-leaved plant), an effect that might result from the larger total cover of E. nuttallii, P. crispus, and C. idzuroei, and the hardness of C. idzuroei leaves. Tolerance to crayfish cutting and feeding was greater in C. idzuroei than in the other species. As the macro-invertebrate assemblages in submerged vegetation are more abundant and species-rich than those in emergent and floating-leaf vegetation, conservation of E. nuttallii and P. crispus should be prioritized for restoring native aquatic animals in ecosystems invaded by the introduced crayfish.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A temporal refuge from predation can change the outcome of prey species competition
    Slade, Andrew
    White, Andy
    Lurz, Peter W. W.
    Shuttleworth, Craig
    Lambin, Xavier
    OIKOS, 2022, 2022 (09)
  • [22] Presence of a small mammalian prey species in open habitat is dependent on refuge availability
    Bhattacharyya, S.
    Dutta, S.
    Adhikari, B. S.
    Rawat, G. S.
    MAMMAL RESEARCH, 2015, 60 (04) : 293 - 300
  • [23] Genetic variation within and among crayfish species
    Crandall, KA
    FRESHWATER CRAYFISH 11: A JOURNAL OF ASTACOLOGY, 1997, : 135 - 145
  • [24] CHEMOCOMMUNICATION AMONG PREY AND PREDATOR SPECIES
    COCKE, R
    THIESSEN, DD
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1986, 14 (01): : 90 - 92
  • [25] Pattern dynamics in a predator-prey model with Smith growth function and prey refuge in predator poisoned environment
    Pal, Debjit
    Kesh, Dipak
    Mukherjee, Debasis
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2024, 92 : 366 - 386
  • [26] Stability analysis of a prey-predator model with holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge
    Huang, Yunjin
    Chen, Fengde
    Zhong, Li
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2006, 182 (01) : 672 - 683
  • [27] Dynamical analysis of a prey-predator model with Beddington-DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge
    Tripathi, Jai Prakash
    Abbas, Syed
    Thakur, Manoj
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2015, 80 (1-2) : 177 - 196
  • [28] SPECIES-DIFFERENCES IN AMPHETAMINE TOLERANCE
    SEVER, PS
    CALDWELL, J
    JOURNAL DE PHARMACOLOGIE, 1974, 5 : 91 - 91
  • [29] SPECIES-DIFFERENCES IN DIET AND PREY SELECTION BY HYDROMEDUSAE
    MILLS, CE
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1988, 28 (04): : A192 - A192
  • [30] Dynamical behaviour of a delayed three species predator–prey model with cooperation among the prey species
    Soumen Kundu
    Sarit Maitra
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2018, 92 : 627 - 643