Effects of knowledge spillovers between competitors on patent quality: what patent citations reveal about a global duopoly

被引:0
|
作者
Manuel Acosta
Daniel Coronado
Esther Ferrándiz
Manuel Jiménez
机构
[1] Universidad de Cádiz,Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
来源
关键词
Technological value; Patent disclosure; Spillovers; Global duopoly; Patent citations; Patent family; O31; O33; D23;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyses the effects on patent quality of a type of spillovers arising from the disclosure of patent information by firms engaged in competition in a global duopoly. Both firms are involved in producing new technologies and they do not cooperate on joint patents. In this context, we explored whether the disclosure of crucial knowledge in the patents of one of the firms affects the patent quality of its respective competitor. The empirical methodology relies on forward citations as an indicator of quality, and backward citations to the competitor as a measure of spillovers. We estimated several count models with a sample of 7750 patent families (divided into subsamples) owned by two large companies, Airbus and Boeing. Our econometric findings show that, for technologies in which the two firms account for the majority of the global patents, neither of the firms in the duopoly was able to harness spillovers from the rival to improve the quality of its patents. However, knowledge from the competitor becomes relevant, at least for one of the focal firms, in explaining patent quality of other technologies in which the two firms do not exert a dominant position.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1487
页数:36
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] A methodology for unveiling global innovation networks: patent citations as clues to cross border knowledge flows
    Leonardo Costa Ribeiro
    Glenda Kruss
    Gustavo Britto
    Américo Tristão Bernardes
    Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101 : 61 - 83
  • [32] A methodology for unveiling global innovation networks: patent citations as clues to cross border knowledge flows
    Ribeiro, Leonardo Costa
    Kruss, Glenda
    Britto, Gustavo
    Bernardes, Americo Tristao
    da Motta e Albuquerque, Eduardo
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (01) : 61 - 83
  • [33] Knowledge spillovers between clean and dirty technologies: Evidence from the patent citation network
    Jee, Su Jung
    Srivastav, Sugandha
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 224
  • [34] Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion
    Nelson, Andrew J.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (06) : 994 - 1005
  • [35] Efficiency of hidden knowledge spillovers between firms and universities in Japan: An empirical analysis based on patent data
    Suzuki, Katsuhiro
    Sakata, Junichi
    Hosoya, Jun
    Nakanishi, Hodaka
    [J]. 2012 IEEE International Technology Management Conference, ITMC 2012, 2012, : 197 - 201
  • [36] Efficiency of hidden knowledge spillovers between firms and universities in Japan: an empirical analysis based on patent data
    Suzuki, Katsuhiro
    Sakata, Junichi
    Hosoya, Jun
    Nakanishi, Hodaka
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (ITMC), 2012, : 197 - 201
  • [37] Economic growth target and patent quality: the heterogeneous effects of knowledge stock
    Shan, Hu
    Lang, Wu
    Ruilei, Liu
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [38] Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations
    E. Bacchiocchi
    F. Montobbio
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009, 34 : 169 - 181
  • [39] Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations
    Bacchiocchi, E.
    Montobbio, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2009, 34 (02): : 169 - 181
  • [40] Knowledge spillovers through quality control requirements on innovation development of global suppliers: The firm size effects
    Qiu, Tianjiao
    Yang, Yaping
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 73 : 171 - 180