A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Renaud Sabatier
Pascal Finetti
Nathalie Cervera
Eric Lambaudie
Benjamin Esterni
Emilie Mamessier
Agnès Tallet
Christian Chabannon
Jean-Marc Extra
Jocelyne Jacquemier
Patrice Viens
Daniel Birnbaum
François Bertucci
机构
[1] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,Département d’Oncologie Moléculaire
[2] UMR891 Inserm,Département d’Oncologie Médicale
[3] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,Département de Chirurgie
[4] Institut Paoli Calmettes,Département de Radiothérapie
[5] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,Département d’Anatomopathologie
[6] UMR891 Inserm,undefined
[7] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,undefined
[8] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,undefined
[9] UMR891 Inserm,undefined
[10] Bureau d’Etudes Cliniques,undefined
[11] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,undefined
[12] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,undefined
[13] UMR891 Inserm,undefined
[14] Centre d’Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy,undefined
[15] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,undefined
[16] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,undefined
[17] UMR891 Inserm,undefined
[18] Centre de Ressources Biologiques,undefined
[19] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,undefined
[20] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,undefined
[21] UMR891 Inserm,undefined
[22] Université de la Méditerranée,undefined
[23] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,undefined
[24] Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,undefined
[25] UMR891 Inserm,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2011年 / 126卷
关键词
Basal breast cancer; DNA microarrays; Medullary; Prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prognosis of basal breast cancers is poor but heterogeneous. Medullary breast cancers (MBC) display a basal profile, but a favorable prognosis. We hypothesized that a previously published 368-gene expression signature associated with MBC might serve to define a prognostic classifier in basal cancers. We collected public gene expression and histoclinical data of 2145 invasive early breast adenocarcinomas. We developed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier based on this 368-gene list in a learning set, and tested its predictive performances in an independent validation set. Then, we assessed its prognostic value and that of six prognostic signatures for disease-free survival (DFS) in the remaining 2034 samples. The SVM model accurately classified all MBC samples in the learning and validation sets. A total of 466 cases were basal across other sets. The SVM classifier separated them into two subgroups, subgroup 1 (resembling MBC) and subgroup 2 (not resembling MBC). Subgroup 1 exhibited 71% 5-year DFS, whereas subgroup 2 exhibited 50% (P = 9.93E-05). The classifier outperformed the classical prognostic variables in multivariate analysis, conferring lesser risk for relapse in subgroup 1 (HR = 0.52, P = 3.9E-04). This prognostic value was specific to the basal subtype, in which none of the other prognostic signatures was informative. Ontology analysis revealed effective immune response (IR), enhanced tumor cell apoptosis, elevated levels of metastasis-inhibiting factors and low levels of metastasis-promoting factors in the good-prognosis subgroup, and a more developed cell migration system in the poor-prognosis subgroup. In conclusion, based on this 368-gene SVM model derived from an MBC signature, basal breast cancers were classified in two prognostic subgroups, suggesting that MBC and basal breast cancers share similar molecular alterations associated with aggressiveness. This signature could help define the prognosis, adapt the systemic treatment, and identify new therapeutic targets.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 420
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic relevance of basal cytokeratin expression in operable breast cancer
    Potemski, P
    Kusinska, R
    Watala, C
    Pluciennik, E
    Bednarek, AK
    Kordek, R
    ONCOLOGY, 2005, 69 (06) : 478 - 485
  • [32] A gene expression signature that defines breast cancer metastases
    Ellsworth, Rachel E.
    Seebach, Jeff
    Field, Lori A.
    Heckman, Caroline
    Kane, Jennifer
    Hooke, Jeffrey A.
    Love, Brad
    Shriver, Craig D.
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2009, 26 (03) : 205 - 213
  • [33] Prognostic gene expression assays in breast cancer: are two better than one?
    Sparano, Joseph A.
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2018, 4
  • [34] A gene expression signature that defines breast cancer metastases
    Rachel E. Ellsworth
    Jeff Seebach
    Lori A. Field
    Caroline Heckman
    Jennifer Kane
    Jeffrey A. Hooke
    Brad Love
    Craig D. Shriver
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2009, 26 : 205 - 213
  • [35] Prognostic gene expression assays in breast cancer: are two better than one?
    Joseph A. Sparano
    npj Breast Cancer, 4
  • [36] Development of a prognostic gene expression signature for invasive bladder cancer
    Chu, In-Sun
    Leem, Sun-Hee
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [37] A two-gene-based prognostic signature for pancreatic cancer
    Zhou, Shuyi
    Yan, Yuanliang
    Chen, Xi
    Zeng, Shuangshuang
    Wei, Jie
    Wang, Xiang
    Gong, Zhicheng
    Xu, Zhijie
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (18): : 18322 - 18342
  • [38] Genome-wide screen identifies a novel prognostic signature for breast cancer survival
    Mao, Xuan Y.
    Lee, Matthew J.
    Zhu, Jeffrey
    Zhu, Carissa
    Law, Sindy M.
    Snijders, Antoine M.
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (08) : 14003 - 14016
  • [39] Gene expression profiling of male breast cancer reveals two subgroups distinct from the intrinsic subtypes of female breast cancer
    Johansson, Ida
    Nilsson, Cecilia
    Berglund, Pontus
    Lauss, Martin
    Ringner, Markus
    Olsson, Hakan
    Luts, Lena
    Thorstensson, Sten
    Fjallskog, Marie-Louise
    Hedenfalk, Ingrid
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [40] Identification of an age-related breast cancer gene expression signature with strong prognostic value.
    Ingebriktsen, Lise Martine
    Akslen, Lars Andreas
    Wik, Elisabeth
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (13)