Evaluation of liquefaction potential and post-liquefaction settlements in a coastal region in Atakum

被引:0
|
作者
Muzaffer Kerem Ertek
Gökhan Demir
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis University,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
关键词
Liquefaction; Standard penetration test (SPT); Pore pressure; Towhata-Iai; Settlement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil liquefaction is one of the most momentous causes of damages induced by earthquakes. It can be described as a sudden decrease in the strength of saturated, cohesionless soil layers, remaining effectual for a length of time under transient and cyclic loading due to excess pore water pressure generation. Consequently, the most appropriate and typical soil condition which brings the potential out to liquefy is loose sand with a groundwater table close to ground surface. This study is pertinent to determine the liquefaction potential in a coastal region in Atakum County of Samsun Province, Turkey. Therefore, empirical equations were used to determine the peak ground accelerations for three scenario earthquakes with the magnitudes of 6.5, 7.0, and 7.2 in order to consider in the simplified procedure context proposed by Seed and Idriss (J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE 97:1249–1273 1971). Liquefaction potential evaluations were performed using standard penetration test blow counts for four boreholes for sandy portions of the soil profile which exist in the first 20 m below ground surface. In addition to analytical evaluations, two-dimensional nonlinear analyses were ran with Towhata-Iai constitutive model suitable for liquefaction analysis available in DIANA finite element software to clarify excess pore pressure generation that leads to liquefaction. It is also well-known that sands tend to densify when subjected to seismic shaking. Densification of undersoil causes settlement at the ground surface. Liquefaction induced settlements usually cause damages on both superstructures and infrastructures. On the basis of this fact, the method proposed by Ishihara and Yoshimine (Soils Found. 32:173–188 1992) was used to determine the settlements for scenario earthquakes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Liquefaction and post-liquefaction of granular material under multi-directional cyclic loading
    Zhang, Hanwen
    Yang, Yunming
    Yu, Hai-Sui
    [J]. MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (11) : 1261 - 1272
  • [33] Horizontal residual post-liquefaction deformation of level ground
    Shamoto, Y
    Zhang, JM
    Tokimatsu, K
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS III, VOL 1 AND 2, 1998, (75): : 373 - 384
  • [34] Triaxial tests on the fluidic behavior of post-liquefaction sand
    Huang, Yu
    Zheng, Hu
    Mao, Wuwei
    Huang, Maosong
    Li, Guanghui
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 67 (08) : 2325 - 2330
  • [35] POST-LIQUEFACTION STABILITY AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF DUNCAN DAM
    PILLAI, VS
    SALGADO, FM
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 31 (06) : 967 - 978
  • [36] Simple approach to evaluate the influence of seismic residual displacements on post-liquefaction settlements of RC-frames
    Grande, Ernesto
    Lirer, Stefania
    Milani, Gabriele
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2022, 37 : 411 - 425
  • [37] Evaluation of Post-Liquefaction Shear Strength and Shear Wave Velocity of Uniform Gravels
    Hubler, Jonathan F.
    Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, Adda
    Zekkos, Dimitrios
    [J]. IFCEE 2018: ADVANCES IN GEOMATERIAL MODELING AND SITE CHARACTERIZATION, 2018, (295): : 276 - 285
  • [38] Triaxial tests on the fluidic behavior of post-liquefaction sand
    Yu Huang
    Hu Zheng
    Wuwei Mao
    Maosong Huang
    Guanghui Li
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 67 : 2325 - 2330
  • [39] Post-liquefaction Settlement Evaluation Method of Non-plastic Silty Sand
    Chang, Mei Hsun
    Chen, Jing Wen
    Lee, Wei Feng
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 51 (04): : 98 - 107
  • [40] Evaluation of post-liquefaction volumetric strain of reconstituted samples based on soil compressibility
    Kim, Jongkwan
    Kazama, Motoki
    Kawai, Tadashi
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2021, 61 (06) : 1555 - 1564