Lay beliefs about boredom: A mixed-methods investigation

被引:0
|
作者
Katy Y. Y. Tam
Wijnand A. P. van Tilburg
Christian S. Chan
机构
[1] University of Toronto,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Essex,Department of Psychology
[3] The University of Hong Kong,Department of Psychology
[4] International Christian University,Department of Psychology and Linguistics
来源
Motivation and Emotion | 2023年 / 47卷
关键词
Boredom; Boredom proneness; Assessment; Emotion beliefs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Boredom is a ubiquitous emotion that has strong behavioral and mental health impacts. Research suggests that how people experience and regulate emotions is influenced by their beliefs about them. What lay beliefs about boredom do people have? The present research sought to answer this question using a mixed-methods approach. In Study 1, we conducted a series of individual and focus-group interviews (N = 29) to explore how people evaluate boredom. In Study 2, we developed and validated a 15-item self-report measure, the Boredom Beliefs Scale (BBS), in Hong Kong Chinese (N = 231) and American (N = 498) samples. In Study 3, we examined the scale’s convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity in a British sample (N = 296). We identified three lay boredom beliefs—the extent to which people recognize the functions of boredom (boredom functionality), affectively dislike this emotion (boredom dislike), and believe its experience to be normal (boredom normalcy). The three-factor BBS was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid scale that showed meaningful relationships with measures of emotion beliefs, boredom, and well-being. Our findings enrich the current literature by introducing a new construct, boredom belief, which has both theoretical and applied significance.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1094
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Alcohol guideline awareness and beliefs among Australian nurses: A mixed-methods study
    Searby, Adam
    Burr, Dianna
    Redley, Bernice
    [J]. COLLEGIAN, 2023, 30 (02) : 386 - 393
  • [42] Nurses' Beliefs Regarding Pain in Critically Ill Children: A Mixed-Methods Study
    LaFond, Cynthia M.
    Vincent, Catherine Van Hulle
    Oosterhouse, Kimberly
    Wilkie, Diana J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2016, 31 (06): : 691 - 700
  • [43] Teachers' Beliefs Towards Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Cruz Sanchez-Gomez, Maria
    Martin-Garcia, Antonio V.
    Mena, Juanjo
    [J]. LEARNING TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION CHALLENGES, LTEC 2019, 2019, 1011 : 177 - 188
  • [44] Boredom and its perceived impact in adolescents with exceptional mathematical talent: a sequential mixed-methods study in Paraguay
    Vuyk, Alexandra
    Montania, Maureen
    Barrios, Liz
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2024, 9
  • [45] Attitudes and personal beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine among people with COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis
    Bennett, Monica M.
    Douglas, Megan
    da Graca, Briget
    Sanchez, Katherine
    Powers, Mark B.
    Warren, Ann Marie
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [46] Attitudes and personal beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine among people with COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis
    Monica M. Bennett
    Megan Douglas
    Briget da Graca
    Katherine Sanchez
    Mark B. Powers
    Ann Marie Warren
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 22
  • [47] Tying Television Comedies to Information Literacy: A Mixed-Methods Investigation
    Tewell, Eamon C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2014, 40 (02): : 134 - 141
  • [48] A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Instructional Coaching for Teachers of Diverse Learners
    Teemant, Annela
    [J]. URBAN EDUCATION, 2014, 49 (05) : 574 - 604
  • [49] Adolescent motivation to attend youth programs: A mixed-methods investigation
    Akiva, Thomas
    Horner, Christy Galletta
    [J]. APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 20 (04) : 278 - 293
  • [50] Experiences of Christian Clients in Secular Psychotherapy: A Mixed-Methods Investigation
    Cragun, Carrie L.
    Friedlander, Myrna L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 59 (03) : 379 - 391