Urine trouble: should we think differently about UTI?

被引:0
|
作者
Travis K. Price
Evann E. Hilt
Tanaka J. Dune
Elizabeth R. Mueller
Alan J. Wolfe
Linda Brubaker
机构
[1] Loyola University Chicago,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine
[2] Weill Cornell Medicine,Department of Urology, Center for Female Pelvic Health
[3] Loyola University Medical Center,Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology
[4] University of California San Diego,Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
[5] University of California San Diego,Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Reproductive Medicine
来源
关键词
Diagnostics; Microbiome; Pathogens; Urinalysis; Urinary tract infection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is clinically important, given that it is one of the most common bacterial infections in adult women. However, the current understanding of UTI remains based on a now disproven concept that the urinary bladder is sterile. Thus, current standards for UTI diagnosis have significant limitations that may reduce the opportunity to improve patient care. Using data from our work and numerous other peer-reviewed studies, we identified four major limitations to the contemporary UTI description: the language of UTI, UTI diagnostic testing, the Escherichia coli-centric view of UTI, and the colony-forming units (CFU) threshold-based diagnosis. Contemporary methods and technology, combined with continued rigorous clinical research can be used to correct these limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条