Evaluation of the VIKOR and FOWA Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Climate-Change Adaptation of Agricultural Water Supply

被引:0
|
作者
Parvin Golfam
Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh
Hugo A. Loáiciga
机构
[1] University of Qom,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] University of California,Department of Geography
来源
关键词
Water evaluation and planning (WEAP); Climate change adaptation strategies; Decision-making criteria; Multi-criteria decision making; VIKOR method; FOWA method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Confronting climate change is a daunting challenge that requires policies for climate adaptation in the field of water resources management. This paper proposes a method for reservoir operation associated with climate-change projections aimed at ensuring the sustainability of agricultural water supply. The method is applied to the Aidoghmoush reservoir in East Azerbaijan province (Iran) employing climate-change projections for 2040–2069, and compares the future-period results with those calculated for the baseline period (1971–2000). The water-supply system depending on the Aidoghmoush reservoir is simulated using the climate-change projections. The water-supply system simulations are ranked with two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods according to their suitability for satisfying agricultural water demands and sustain cropping patterns. These are the multi-criteria optimization and compromise resolution (VIKOR) and the Fuzzy Order Weighted Average (FOWA) MCDM methods. The MCDM methods identify the best water-supply management alternatives for climate-change adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:2867 / 2884
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review
    Aleksander Banasik
    Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard
    Argyris Kanellopoulos
    G. D. H. Claassen
    Jack G. A. J. van der Vorst
    Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2018, 30 : 366 - 396
  • [42] Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review
    Banasik, Aleksander
    Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M.
    Kanellopoulos, Argyris
    Claassen, G. D. H.
    van der Vorst, Jack G. A. J.
    FLEXIBLE SERVICES AND MANUFACTURING JOURNAL, 2018, 30 (03) : 366 - 396
  • [43] Multi-criteria decision making based on trust and reputation in supply chain
    Chang, Liu
    Ouzrout, Yacine
    Nongaillard, Antoine
    Bouras, Abdelaziz
    Jiliu, Zhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 147 : 362 - 372
  • [44] Is it possible to use multi-criteria criteria decision making methods for rural typology?
    Klufova, Renata
    Rost, Michael
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2014), 2014, : 419 - 424
  • [45] DS-VIKOR: A New Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method for Supplier Selection
    Liguo Fei
    Yong Deng
    Yong Hu
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 21 : 157 - 175
  • [46] Evaluation of River Water Transfer Alternatives with the TODIM Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat
    Golfam, Parvin
    Loaiciga, Hugo A.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (15) : 4847 - 4863
  • [47] Evaluation of River Water Transfer Alternatives with the TODIM Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh
    Parvin Golfam
    Hugo A. Loáiciga
    Water Resources Management, 2020, 34 : 4847 - 4863
  • [48] Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management
    Zarghami, Mahdi
    Abrishamchi, Ahmad
    Ardakanian, Reza
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (08) : 1017 - 1029
  • [49] Multi-Criteria Decision Making on the position of High Water Mark
    Liu, Xin
    Xia, Jianhong
    Wright, Graeme
    Arnold, Lesley
    Liu, Qiang
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 102 : 191 - 199
  • [50] Multi-criteria Decision Making for Integrated Urban Water Management
    Mahdi Zarghami
    Ahmad Abrishamchi
    Reza Ardakanian
    Water Resources Management, 2008, 22 : 1017 - 1029