Radiological screening of maternal periodontitis for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Ju Sun Heo
Ki Hoon Ahn
Jung Soo Park
机构
[1] Korea University College of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics, Anam Hospital
[2] Korea University College of Medicine,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anam Hospital
[3] Korea University College of Medicine,Department of Periodontology, Anam Hospital
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is well known that periodontitis, diagnosed mainly by periodontal probing, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, periodontal probing is time-consuming, highly discomforting, inaccurate, and invasive. We aimed to assess whether periodontitis severity based on radiological staging in accordance with the 2017 new consensus classification was related to adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. The medical records of 165 mothers who underwent panoramic radiography within 5 years before and after the time of delivery and of their singleton neonates were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two mothers (13.3%) had severe periodontitis (SP), and 143 (86.7%) had mild or moderate periodontitis (MP). In relation to adverse pregnancy outcomes, uterine leiomyoma (18.2% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.029), chronic hypertension (9.1% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.047), and preeclampsia (13.6% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.032) occurred significantly more frequently in the SP group than in the MP group. The incidences of very preterm birth (13.6% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.017), extremely preterm birth (9.1% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.047), and small for gestational age (22.7% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.017) were also significantly higher in the SP group than in the MP group. Radiological screening of maternal periodontitis could be useful for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes as well as diagnosing SP in pregnant women.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is umbilicocerebral ratio better than cerebroplacental ratio for predicting adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes?
    Kalafat, Erkan
    Kalaylioglu, Zeynep
    Thilaganathan, Basky
    Khalil, Asma
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (03) : 462 - 463
  • [22] Maternal infection and adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes
    Goldenberg, RL
    Culhane, JF
    Johnson, DC
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2005, 32 (03) : 523 - +
  • [23] A risk scoring model for predicting adverse maternal outcomes in pregnancy with pre-eclampsia
    Suksai, Manaphat
    Geater, Alan
    Amornchat, Pawinee
    Suwanrath, Chitkasaem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2025,
  • [24] Microorganisms of maternal periodontitis cause adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetic individuals: a preliminary observational report
    Choudhury, Pallabi
    Rao, Ravl. J.
    Prabhu, Srikumar
    Srirangarajan, Sridharan
    Rudresh, Vinaya
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 53 (10): : 850 - 858
  • [25] Screening for abnormal placentation and adverse pregnancy outcomes with maternal serum biomarkers in the second trimester
    Goetzinger, Katherine R.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (07) : 635 - 641
  • [26] Maternal sleep position and adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Silver, Robert M.
    Gibbins, Karen J.
    Hunter, Shannon
    Parker, Corette
    Reddy, Uma
    Facco, Francesca
    Grobman, Bill
    Saade, George
    Simhan, Hyagriv
    Pien, Grace
    Schubert, Frank
    Louis, Judette
    Zee, Phyllis
    Mercer, Brian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S478 - S478
  • [27] Poverty, maternal health, and adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Nagahawatte, N. Tanya
    Goldenberg, Robert L.
    REDUCING THE IMPACT OF POVERTY ON HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES, 2008, 1136 : 80 - 85
  • [28] Maternal iodine insufficiency and adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Charoenratana, Cholaros
    Leelapat, Posri
    Traisrisilp, Kuntharee
    Tongsong, Theera
    MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2016, 12 (04): : 680 - 687
  • [29] Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Frick, Alexander P.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 70 : 92 - 100