Dynamic structural equation models with binary and ordinal outcomes in Mplus

被引:0
|
作者
Daniel McNeish
Jennifer A. Somers
Andrea Savord
机构
[1] Arizona State University,
[2] University of California,undefined
[3] Los Angeles,undefined
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2024年 / 56卷
关键词
Intensive longitudinal data; Categorical data; Discrete data; DSEM; Time-series analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Intensive longitudinal designs are increasingly popular, as are dynamic structural equation models (DSEM) to accommodate unique features of these designs. Many helpful resources on DSEM exist, though they focus on continuous outcomes while categorical outcomes are omitted, briefly mentioned, or considered as a straightforward extension. This viewpoint regarding categorical outcomes is not unwarranted for technical audiences, but there are non-trivial nuances in model building and interpretation with categorical outcomes that are not necessarily straightforward for empirical researchers. Furthermore, categorical outcomes are common given that binary behavioral indicators or Likert responses are frequently solicited as low-burden variables to discourage participant non-response. This tutorial paper is therefore dedicated to providing an accessible treatment of DSEM in Mplus exclusively for categorical outcomes. We cover the general probit model whereby the raw categorical responses are assumed to come from an underlying normal process. We cover probit DSEM and expound why existing treatments have considered categorical outcomes as a straightforward extension of the continuous case. Data from a motivating ecological momentary assessment study with a binary outcome are used to demonstrate an unconditional model, a model with disaggregated covariates, and a model for data with a time trend. We provide annotated Mplus code for these models and discuss interpretation of the results. We then discuss model specification and interpretation in the case of an ordinal outcome and provide an example to highlight differences between ordinal and binary outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of caveats and extensions.
引用
收藏
页码:1506 / 1532
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables
    Katsikatsou, Myrsini
    Moustaki, Irini
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2016, 81 (04) : 1046 - 1068
  • [32] Assessment of generalised Bayesian structural equation models for continuous and binary data
    Vamvourellis, Konstantinos
    Kalogeropoulos, Konstantinos
    Moustaki, Irini
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (03): : 559 - 584
  • [33] Propensity Score Analysis of Complex Survey Data with Structural Equation Modeling: A Tutorial with Mplus
    Leite, Walter L.
    Stapleton, Laura M.
    Bettini, Elizabeth F.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 26 (03) : 448 - 469
  • [34] Residual Structures in Growth Models With Ordinal Outcomes
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    Liu, Yu
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (03) : 466 - 475
  • [35] Structural equation models for area health outcomes with model selection
    Congdon, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2011, 38 (04) : 745 - 767
  • [36] Bayesian transition models for ordinal longitudinal outcomes
    Rohde, Maximilian D.
    French, Benjamin
    Stewart, Thomas G.
    Harrell Jr, Frank E.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (18) : 3539 - 3561
  • [37] Dynamic structural equation models for directed cyclic graphs: the structural identifiability problem
    Wang, Yulin
    Luo, Yu
    Wu, Hulin
    Miao, Hongyu
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2019, 12 (03) : 365 - 375
  • [38] Deep and interpretable regression models for ordinal outcomes
    Kook, Lucas
    Herzog, Lisa
    Hothorn, Torsten
    Durr, Oliver
    Sick, Beate
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2022, 122
  • [39] Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: Practical Guidelines and Tutorial With a Convenient Online Tool for Mplus
    van Zyl, Llewellyn E.
    ten Klooster, Peter M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 12
  • [40] Dynamic Structural Equation Models for Tracking Topologies of Social Networks
    Baingana, Brian
    Mateos, Gonzalo
    Giannakis, Georgios B.
    2013 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL ADVANCES IN MULTI-SENSOR ADAPTIVE PROCESSING (CAMSAP 2013), 2013, : 292 - 295