Coppice reintroduction in the Czech Republic: extent, motivation and obstacles

被引:0
|
作者
Anežka Kozdasová
Lucie Galčanová Batista
Radim Hédl
Péter Szabó
机构
[1] Masaryk University,Department of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Social Studies
[2] Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences,Department of Vegetation Ecology
[3] Palacký University in Olomouc,Department of Botany, Faculty of Science
来源
关键词
Traditional forest management; Central Europe; Nature conservation; Management policy; Economic potential; Semi-structured interviews;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coppicing is a form of forest management in European broadleaved forests. While it is still practised in south-eastern Europe, in central and western Europe it was almost completely replaced by high forest management. Currently, there are increasing efforts to reintroduce coppice management into former coppice woods. However, little comprehensive knowledge is available about the extent and management of coppice reintroduction and the processes governing it. In this paper, we present an overview of localities in the Czech Republic where coppice reintroduction was taking place in 2020. We identified 8 localities and conducted 10 semi-structured interviews with experts involved in their management in order to understand what motivated them to restart coppicing and what obstacles they have had to face. The main motivation of site managers is nature conservation, while the most important obstacles are operational issues, such as bureaucracy, complicated land ownership and legal responsibilities or lack of workforce. Other motivating factors identified in other European countries (production of a renewable energy source and potential for rural employment) have so far played a minor role in the Czech Republic. We conclude that a major challenge for future forest policies will be to utilise the economic experiences of regions with active coppicing to foster the spread of coppice woods in order to combine renewable energy production with biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Response of diameter and height increment to thinning in oak-hornbeam coppice in the southeastern part of the Czech Republic
    Fedorová B.
    Kadavý J.
    Adamec Z.
    Kneifl M.
    Knott R.
    Fedorová, Barbora (xfedorov@mendelu.cz), 1600, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (62): : 229 - 235
  • [22] A FLAT WORLD? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE UNITED STATES
    Lanik, Martin
    Thornton, George C., III
    Hoskovcova, Simona
    STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, 51 (01) : 69 - 84
  • [23] Motivation of Employees of Transport and Logistics Companies in the Czech Republic and in a Selected Region of the PRC
    Lizbetinova, Lenka
    Hitka, Milos
    Li, Chenguang
    Caha, Zdenek
    18TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE-LOGI 2017, 2017, 134
  • [24] Differences in Employee Motivation in Selected Countries of CEE (Slovakia, Lithuania and the Czech Republic)
    Hitka, Milos
    Balazova, Zaneta
    Grazulis, Vladimiras
    Lejskova, Pavia
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2018, 29 (05): : 536 - 547
  • [25] Emploee motivation in international IT company in its subsidiaries: Slovakia, Czech Republic and India
    Budzakova, Maria
    PSYCHOLOGIE PRACE A ORGANIZACE 2015, 2015, : 35 - 53
  • [26] Corporate Social Responsibility: Motivation, Perception, and Activities among SMEs in the Czech Republic
    Slaba, Marie
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2020, 21 (177): : 68 - 73
  • [27] Overcoming obstacles to liberalisation of the telecom sector in Estonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Hungary.
    Radosevic, S
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2000, 24 (10-11) : 983 - 985
  • [28] Czech Republic
    Alperowicz, N
    CHEMICAL WEEK, 1998, 160 (38) : 20 - 20
  • [29] Czech Republic
    Matejovic, J
    TRANSPORT ECONOMICS RESEARCH AND POLICYMAKING: SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS AND INTRODUCTORY REPORTS, 1999, : 87 - 94
  • [30] Czech republic
    Navrátilová, H
    CAHIERS DE DROIT FISCAL INTERNATIONAL, VOL LXXXIIIA: TAX TREATMENT OF CORPORATE LOSSES, 1998, 83 : 411 - 417