Spatial distribution of maize roots by complete 3D soil monolith sampling

被引:0
|
作者
Rolf O. Kuchenbuch
Horst H. Gerke
Uwe Buczko
机构
[1] Agricultural Analysis and Research Institute (LUFA) Rostock,Institute for Soil Landscape Research
[2] Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF),Institute for Land Use
[3] University of Rostock,undefined
来源
Plant and Soil | 2009年 / 315卷
关键词
Corn; Line intersect method; Maize (; L.); Root length density; Root mass; Row spacing; Soil bulk density; Soil volumetric sampling; Spatial variability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The spatial distribution of root length density (RLD) is important for water and nutrient uptake by plants and biomass allocation in the soil. Experimental root assessment is, however, mostly based on methods that encompass only small fractions of the soil volume. The aim of this study was to characterize the three dimensional (3D) spatial distribution of RLD in the soil of a maize crop for plots of 37.5 and 75 cm row spacing. At each plot, a 3D soil monolith of 70 × 40 × 30 (=84,000) cm3 was completely sampled in form of 84 cubic samples of 10 cm edge length. Roots were washed from the soil and RLD was determined using the line intersect method. In 2004, mean RLD values were 0.41 cm cm−3 for narrow and 0.34 cm cm−3 for wide row spacing at row closure (55 days after planting; DAP) and 0.74 cm cm−3 (1.37 cm cm−3 in 2003) for narrow and 0.77 cm cm−3 (0.96 cm cm−3 in 2003) for wide row spacing at tasseling (104 DAP). The CV values for RLD of 48% to 72% in 2004 were first higher for wide than for narrow row spacing but at the later growth stage (tasseling) lower for wide than for narrow. For individual vertical soil slices, CV values for RLD were about 40–60%, irrespective of the orientation of the slice. The results suggest that RLD was related mainly to the spatial location and the plant row structure, and not governed unambiguously by SBD or SWC. The spatially distributed maize root data suggest that variability of RLD parallel to plant rows is not negligible. Any simplified use of 1D or 2D vertical samples at separate locations may lead to erroneous estimations of RLD profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 314
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D Topological Relations for 3D Spatial Analysis
    Zuliansyah, Mochammad
    Supangkat, Suhono Harso
    Priyana, Yoga
    Machbub, Carmadi
    [J]. 2008 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1203 - 1208
  • [32] Perception of 3D spatial relations for 3D displays
    Rosen, P
    Pizlo, Z
    Hoffmann, C
    Popescu, V
    [J]. STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS XI, 2004, 5291 : 9 - 16
  • [33] Transparent soil microcosms allow 3D spatial quantification of soil microbiological processes in vivo
    Downie, Helen F.
    Valentine, Tracy A.
    Otten, Wilfred
    Spiers, Andrew J.
    Dupuy, Lionel X.
    [J]. PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 9 (10)
  • [34] Geoelectrical Method to Obtain 3D Maps for Distribution of Fertilizer in the Soil
    Alves, Aylton J.
    Furriel, Geovanne P.
    Calixto, Wesley P.
    Godoi, Fabiana
    Silva, Jose R. S.
    Profeta, Francisco A.
    Domingos, Jose L.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (EEEIC), 2016,
  • [35] Efficient sampling in 3D tomography
    Desbat, L
    [J]. THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION IN RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 4 : 87 - 99
  • [36] The roles of sampling depth, lateral profile density and vertical sampling density in 3D digital soil mapping of soil organic carbon
    Zhang, Mei-Wei
    Sun, Xiao-Lin
    Wang, Xiao-Qing
    Yang, Hua-Lei
    Wang, Hui-Li
    Huang, Zhi-Gang
    Jiang, Dai-Hua
    Wu, Yun-Jin
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2024, 445
  • [37] Spatial 3D mapping of forest soil carbon stocks in Hesse, Germany
    Heitkamp, Felix
    Ahrends, Bernd
    Evers, Jan
    Meesenburg, Henning
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 184 (06) : 635 - 656
  • [38] Sparse regression interaction models for spatial prediction of soil properties in 3D
    Pejovic, Milutin
    Nikolic, Mladen
    Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
    Hengl, Tomislav
    Kilibarda, Milan
    Bajat, Branislav
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 118 : 1 - 13
  • [39] Evaluating 3D spatial pyramids for classifying 3D shapes
    Lopez-Sastre, R. J.
    Garcia-Fuertes, A.
    Redondo-Cabrera, C.
    Acevedo-Rodriguez, F. J.
    Maldonado-Bascon, S.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK, 2013, 37 (05): : 473 - 483
  • [40] Quantitative 3D Analysis of Plant Roots Growing in Soil Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    van Dusschoten, Dagmar
    Metzner, Ralf
    Kochs, Johannes
    Postma, Johannes A.
    Pflugfelder, Daniel
    Buehler, Jonas
    Schurr, Ulrich
    Jahnke, Siegfried
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 170 (03) : 1176 - 1188