Treatment of Esophageal Motility Disorders Based on the Chicago Classification

被引:17
|
作者
Carla Maradey-Romero
Scott Gabbard
Ronnie Fass
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve University,The Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
[2] MetroHealth Medical Center,Center for Swallowing & Esophageal Disorders, Digestive Disease Institute, Gastroenterology & Hepatology
[3] Cleveland Clinic,undefined
关键词
GERD; NCCP; Dysphagia; Esophageal motility disorders; Chicago classification;
D O I
10.1007/s11938-014-0032-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Chicago Classification divides esophageal motor disorders based on the recorded value of the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). The first group includes those with an elevated mean IRP that is associated with peristaltic abnormalities such as achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. The second group includes those with a normal mean IRP that is associated with esophageal hypermotility disorders such as distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus (jackhammer esophagus), and hypertensive peristalsis (nutcracker esophagus). The third group includes those with a normal mean IRP that is associated with esophageal hypomotility peristaltic abnormalities such as absent peristalsis, weak peristalsis with small or large breaks, and frequent failed peristalsis. The therapeutic options vary greatly between the different groups of esophageal motor disorders. In achalasia patients, potential treatment strategies comprise medical therapy (calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors), endoscopic procedures (botulinum toxin A injection, pneumatic dilation, or peroral endoscopic myotomy) or surgery (Heller myotomy). Patients with a normal IRP and esophageal hypermotility disorder are candidates for medical therapy (nitrates, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, cimetropium/ipratropium bromide, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors), endoscopic procedures (botulinum toxin A injection and peroral endoscopic myotomy), or surgery (Heller myotomy). Lastly, in patients with a normal IRP and esophageal hypomotility disorder, treatment is primarily focused on controlling the presence of gastroesophageal reflux with proton pump inhibitors and lifestyle modifications (soft and liquid diet and eating in the upright position) to address patient’s dysphagia.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 455
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of 5 Upright-Swallows Protocol According to the Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders
    Xiao, Yinglian
    Nicodeme, Frederic
    de Ruigh, Annemijn
    Kahrilas, Peter J.
    Pandolfino, John E.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S234 - S235
  • [22] NEW CLASSIFICATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS (CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION VERSION 4.0(C)) AND CHAGAS DISEASE ESOPHAGOPATHY (ACHALASIA)
    Herbella, Fernando Augusto Mardiros
    Malafaia, Osvaldo
    Patti, Marco G.
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (04):
  • [23] Reinterpretation of Follow-Up, High-Resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders Based on the Updated Chicago Classification
    Song, Jun Young
    Park, Moo In
    Kim, Do Hyun
    Yoo, Chan Hui
    Park, Seun Ja
    Moon, Won
    Kim, Hyung Hun
    GUT AND LIVER, 2013, 7 (03) : 377 - 381
  • [24] Treatment Strategy of Poem for Esophageal Motility Disorders Based on Chi Cag plus O Classification
    Tatsuta, Tetsuya
    Sumi, Kazuya
    Ikebuchi, Yuichiro
    Ominami, Masaki
    Ikeda, Haruo
    Onimaru, Manabu
    Goda, Kenichi
    Ito, Hiroaki
    Inoue, Haruhiro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB600 - AB600
  • [25] Chicago Classification ver. 4.0: An Overview of Esophageal Motility Disorders on High-resolution Manometry
    Lee, Tae Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 79 (02): : 55 - 60
  • [26] Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by Chicago Classification 4.0 Compared to Chicago Classification 3.0
    Adil, Syed Ahmad
    Kurin, Michael
    Damjanovska, Sofi
    Tanner, Samuel
    Greer, Katarina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S172 - S173
  • [27] Comparison between Chicago III and Chicago II classification in diagnosing esophageal motility disorder
    Alsaegh, Ahmed
    Ong, A. M. L.
    Ngai, Eileen
    Namasivayam, Vikneswaran
    Wang, Yu Tien
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 3 - 3
  • [28] Comparison Between Chicago III and Chicago II Classification in Diagnosing Esophageal Motility Disorder
    Alsaegh, Ahmed
    Ong, Andrew Ming Liang
    Wang, Yu Tien
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S290 - S290
  • [29] TREATMENT OF PRIMARY ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS
    JANSSENS, J
    VANTRAPPEN, G
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1986, 24 : 35 - 39
  • [30] The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders
    Xiao, Y.
    Read, A.
    Nicodeme, F.
    Roman, S.
    Kahrilas, P. J.
    Pandolfino, J. E.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 (10): : e509 - e516