Donor motives, public preferences and the allocation of UK foreign aid: a discrete choice experiment approach

被引:0
|
作者
Simon Feeny
Paul Hansen
Stephen Knowles
Mark McGillivray
Franz Ombler
机构
[1] RMIT University,School of Economics, Finance and Marketing
[2] University of Otago,undefined
[3] Deakin University,undefined
[4] 1000minds,undefined
来源
Review of World Economics | 2019年 / 155卷
关键词
Foreign aid; Discrete choice experiment (DCE); Cluster analysis; UK; F35; H50; C90;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper develops a prescriptive model for the inter-country allocation of aid from the UK government. The model incorporates three broad motives for allocating aid: recipient need, donor interests and absorptive capacity (the ability of recipient countries to use aid effectively). To determine each motive’s relative importance, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving more than 1600 members of the UK general population was conducted. Absorptive capacity is the most important motive, and recipient need and donor interests are equally but much less important. Current UK aid allocations are compared with those prescribed by the model. Some countries, including China, India and Indonesia, would receive much more if aid were allocated according to the model; other countries, including Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Pakistan, would receive much less. Cluster analysis reveals that the political parties voted for by DCE participants at the 2015 general election are, inter alia, related to their aid preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 537
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR GENETIC SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Veldwijk, J.
    Lambooij, M. S.
    Bredenoord, A.
    van Kranen, H.
    Dekker, E.
    Kallenberg, F.
    Smit, H. A.
    de Wit, G. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A647 - A647
  • [22] Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment
    Kim-Sarah Krinke
    Ulla Tangermann
    Volker Eric Amelung
    Christian Krauth
    BMC Family Practice, 20
  • [23] Public preferences for meat tax attributes in The Netherlands: A discrete choice experiment
    Siegerink, Veerle E.
    Delnoij, Joyce
    Alpizar, Francisco
    FOOD POLICY, 2024, 128
  • [24] TRANSPLANT PHYSICIANS' PREFERENCES IN DECEASED ORGAN ALLOCATION: A PILOT DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Oedingen, C.
    Bartling, T.
    Schrem, H.
    Krauth, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S501 - S501
  • [25] NEUROLOGIST PREFERENCES IN THE UK FOR RRMS TREATMENTS: FINDINGS FROM A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Tencer, T.
    Kumar, J.
    Beusterien, K.
    Will, O.
    Mackie, D.
    Cambron-Mellott, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S641 - S642
  • [26] Patient preferences or management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment
    Fletcher, Benjamin
    Hinton, Lisa
    McManus, Richard
    Rivero-Arias, Oliver
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (686): : E629 - E637
  • [27] The Trade-Off between Chance of Success and Urgency in Organ Allocation: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Public Preferences
    Van, M. Dao
    Lauerer, M.
    Schaetzlein, V.
    Nagel, E.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2016, 78 (07) : 454 - 459
  • [28] Foreign aid preferences and perceptions in donor countries
    Kaufmann, Daniel
    McGuirk, Eoin F.
    Vicente, Pedro C.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2019, 47 (03) : 601 - 617
  • [29] Understanding public preferences and trade-offs for government responses during a pandemic: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment in the UK
    Genie, Mesfin G.
    Loria-Rebolledo, Luis Enrique
    Paranjothy, Shantini
    Powell, Daniel
    Ryan, Mandy
    Sakowsky, Ruben Andreas
    Watson, Verity
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [30] A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    Thomas, Chloe V.
    Morris, Stephen
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 177