共 50 条
Cefprozil versus Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Acute Sinusitis
被引:0
|作者:
Edwin R. Brankston
H.S. Conter
R. Corriveau
J.M. Martel
C. Laroche
R. Roy
C. Savard
D. Roy
R. Kelly
P. Forget
M. Rivard
F. Boulerice
机构:
[1] Oshawa Clinic,
[2] Gladstone Professional Centre,undefined
[3] Clinique Médicale Cadillac,undefined
[4] Parkdale Clinic,undefined
[5] CLSC Verdun,undefined
[6] Notre-Dame Hospital,undefined
[7] Centre Médical Pierrefonds,undefined
[8] Clinique Médicale Adoncour,undefined
[9] University of Montréal,undefined
[10] Bristol-Myers Squibb,undefined
来源:
关键词:
Adis International Limited;
Sinusitis;
Cefuroxime;
Drug Invest;
Acute Sinusitis;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
The objective of this multicentre, randomised, open-label, general practice (GP) study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cefprozil (Cefzil™, Bristol-Myers Squibb) compared with that of cefuroxime axetil (Ceftin®, Glaxo Wellcome) in the treatment of adult subjects with acute sinusitis. Typical of the GP setting, diagnosis was made based solely on clinical signs and symptoms of acute disease. Sinus radiography was performed post-randomisation. A total of 381 adolescent and adult patients were randomly assigned to 10 days’ treatment with either cefprozil, 500mg orally twice daily (n = 191), or cefuroxime axetil, 250mg orally twice daily (n = 190). Based on predefined criteria, treatments were found to be equally effective in terms of proportions of patients in the per-protocol population that were cured, improved or failed (p = 0.20). Similar results were observed when the evaluation was performed on the subset of patients with radiographic evidence of sinusitis and when the evaluation was based on the investigator's judgement. Similar rates of adverse events were observed in the two treatment groups.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:9
相关论文