Phenotypic variation in Australian wild Cajanus and their interspecific hybrids

被引:0
|
作者
Prameela Vanambathina
Rao C. N. Rachaputi
Robert J Henry
Sally L Norton
机构
[1] The University of Queensland,Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI)
[2] Australian Grains Genebank,undefined
[3] Agriculture Victoria,undefined
来源
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution | 2019年 / 66卷
关键词
CWR (Crop wild relatives); Pigeonpea; Australian ; Wild species; Phenotyping;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wild species are potential sources of genetic diversity for crop improvement. Variation in agronomically important traits has been reported in the wild Cajanus species however, the Australian wild species have not been characterized to date. A subset of four Australian wild Cajanus acutifolius (F.Muell.) Maesen accessions and 57 interspecific hybrids of C. acutifolius, Cajanus lanuginosus (S.T.Reynolds & Pedley) Maesen, Cajanus lanceolatus (W.Fitzg.) Maesen, and two C. cajan genotypes were investigated to assess the phenotypic diversity for 17 qualitative and six quantitative traits. Significant variation in stem thickness, days to 50% flowering (dff) (f.pr < 0.001), and raceme number (f.pr < 0.021) within a group, and plant height, stem thickness, leaf size and dff (f.pr < 0.001) between groups was found. In contrast to earlier reports, some wild C. acutifolius accessions were found to be early (AGG31815WCAJ with 117 days) and medium (AGG316925WCAJ with 140 days) maturating types. Positive correlation of plant height with stem thickness (r = 0.714), and dff (r = 0.780) was observed in late maturing types. Positive correlation of stem thickness with leaf size (r = 0.709), and dff (r = 0.760) were identified in all groups. Even though there was a slight negative correlation of the number of racemes with plant height (r = − 0.126) and stem thickness (r = − 0.190), a considerable positive correlation was observed with secondary (r = 0.536) and tertiary (r = 0.500) branches. The F1s produced with wild Cajanus acutifolius as the female parent were sterile demonstrating the potential for use in hybrid breeding programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1699 / 1712
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Cytogenetic and phenotypic variation in somatic Solanum hybrids
    Gavrilenko, T
    Thieme, R
    BEITRAGE ZUR ZUCHTUNGSFORSCHUNG, VOL 4 NO 2, 1998, 1998, : 51 - 56
  • [13] PHENOTYPIC VARIATION, HETEROSIS AND HERITABILITY OF A TOMATO INTERSPECIFIC CROSS
    Hernandez-Bautista, Aurelio
    Lobato-Ortiz, Ricardo
    Cruz-Izquierdo, Serafin
    Jesus Garcia-Zavala, J.
    Luis Chavez-Servia, Jose
    INTERCIENCIA, 2014, 39 (05) : 327 - 332
  • [14] A differential phenotypic expression of a divergent spindle mutation in interspecific Brachiaria hybrids
    Felismino, Mariana Ferrari
    Pagliarini, Maria Suely
    do Valle, Cacilda Borges
    CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 32 (11) : 1459 - 1463
  • [15] Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Newly Obtained Interspecific Hybrids in the Campanula Genus
    Roper, Anna-Catharina
    Orabi, Jihad
    Lutken, Henrik
    Christensen, Brian
    Skou, Anne-Marie Thonning
    Muller, Renate
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [16] Haplogenome assembly reveals structural variation in Eucalyptus interspecific hybrids
    Loetter, Anneri
    Duong, Tuan A.
    Candotti, Julia
    Mizrachi, Eshchar
    Wegrzyn, Jill L.
    Myburg, Alexander A.
    GIGASCIENCE, 2023, 12
  • [17] NUCLEOLAR NUMBER VARIATION IN HORDEUM SPECIES, THEIR HAPLOIDS AND INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDS
    JESSOP, CM
    SUBRAHMANYAM, NC
    GENETICA, 1984, 64 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [18] Production of interspecific hybrids between Japanese gentians and wild species of Gentiana
    Takamura, Yutaro
    Asano, Chiharu
    Hikage, Takashi
    Hatakeyama, Katsunori
    Takahata, Yoshihito
    BREEDING SCIENCE, 2019, 69 (04) : 680 - 687
  • [19] EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO VERTICILLIUM WILT IN DIPLOID, WILD POTATO INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDS
    CONCIBIDO, VC
    SECOR, GA
    JANSKY, SH
    EUPHYTICA, 1994, 76 (1-2) : 145 - 152
  • [20] Identification of interspecific hybrids among domesticated apple and its wild relatives
    Briana L. Gross
    Adam D. Henk
    Philip L. Forsline
    Christopher M. Richards
    Gayle M. Volk
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2012, 8 : 1223 - 1235