The technical adequacy of curriculum-based writing measures with English learners

被引：0
|
作者：
Heather Campbell
Christine A. Espin
Kristen McMaster
机构：
[1] St. Olaf College,
[2] Leiden University,undefined
[3] University of Minnesota,undefined
来源：
Reading and Writing | 2013年 / 26卷
关键词：
Assessment; CBM; Curriculum-based measurement; English as a second language; English language learners; Secondary school; Writing;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of Curriculum-Based Measures in writing for English learners. Participants were 36 high school English learners with moderate to high levels of English language proficiency. Predictor variables were type of writing prompt (picture, narrative, and expository), time (3, 5, and 7 min), and scoring procedure (words written, words spelled correctly, correct word sequences, correct minus incorrect word sequences). Criterion variables were teacher ratings of writing performance and student performance on the Test of Written Language-III, the writing subtest of the Test of Emerging Academic English, and the Minnesota state writing test. Results supported the validity and reliability of a 5 to 7-min writing sample written in response to a narrative or picture prompt and scored for percent of correct word sequences, correct minus incorrect word sequences, or words written plus correct minus incorrect word sequences.
引用
收藏
页码：431 / 452
页数：21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Curriculum-based measurement yearly growth rates: An examination of English Language Learners and native English speakers
    Keller-Margulis, Milena A.
    Clemens, Nathan H.
    Im, Myung Hee
    Kwok, Oi-man
    Booth, Carol
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 22 (06) : 799 - 805
  • [32] The Potential for Automated Text Evaluation to Improve the Technical Adequacy of Written Expression Curriculum-Based Measurement
    Mercer, Sterett H.
    Keller-Margulis, Milena A.
    Faith, Erin L.
    Reid, Erin K.
    Ochs, Sarah
    LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 2019, 42 (02) : 117 - 128
  • [33] Aspects of Technical Adequacy of an Early-Writing Measure for English Language Learners in Grades 1 to 3
    Smith, R. Alex
    Lembke, Erica S.
    ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2021, 47 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [34] What is the nature of change in late elementary writing and are curriculum-based measures sensitive to that change?
    Valentine, Katherine A.
    Truckenmiller, Adrea J.
    Troia, Gary A.
    Aldridge, Sydney
    ASSESSING WRITING, 2021, 50
  • [35] Assessing curriculum-based reading and writing samples
    Nelson, NW
    Van Meter, AM
    TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 2002, 22 (02) : 35 - 59
  • [36] Extending Curriculum-based Assessment to Early Writing
    Parker, David C.
    Burns, Matthew K.
    McMaster, Kristen L.
    Shapiro, Edward S.
    LEARNING DISABILITIES RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2012, 27 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [37] Scoring measures of word dictation curriculum-based measurement in writing: Effects of incremental administration
    Poch, Apryl L.
    Allen, Abigail A.
    Lembke, Erica S.
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2019, 56 (05) : 702 - 723
  • [38] Curriculum-Based Readers Theatre as an Approach to Literacy and Content Area Instruction for English Language Learners
    Uribe, Samantha N.
    READING & WRITING QUARTERLY, 2019, 35 (03) : 243 - 260
  • [39] Investigating the Technical Adequacy of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Written Expression for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
    Cheng, Shu-Fen
    Rose, Susan
    JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2009, 14 (04): : 503 - 515
  • [40] An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill
    Gansle, KA
    Noell, GH
    Vanderheyden, AM
    Slider, NJ
    Hoffpauir, LD
    Whitmarsh, EL
    Naquin, GM
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2004, 41 (03) : 291 - 300
12345