The use of host reproduction number and host suitability index to rank hosts of fruit flies in Africa

被引:0
|
作者
Bernard C. Dominiak
机构
[1] New South Wales Department of Primary Industries,
关键词
Host status; Tephritidae; Quarantine; Phytosanitary; Non-host; Index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Tephritid fruit flies are major economic pests for fruit production and are an impediment to trade. Different host fruits are known to vary in their capacity or suitability for fruit flies to complete their life cycle and this is particularly important for regional and local fruit fly management. The capacity of host fruit to support the full life cycle of fruit flies is measured by the number of adults produced from one kg of fruit. This metric is termed the Host Reproduction Number (HRN) and values range from zero for non-hosts to many hundreds for highly suitable hosts. Twenty-one published papers were reviewed to extract fly-host data. Here, the HRN was used to divide host status into six Host Suitability Index (HSI) categories. The HRN and HSI concept was applied to 21 host status papers covering 211 hosts and nine species of polyphagous fruit flies in Africa. Preferably, field infestation rate was used, rather than laboratory experiments. The HRN and HSI may be a useful concept in developing management strategies that recognise varying host status, for determining surveillance and detection protocols for potential incursions, and to guide the appropriate regulatory response during endemic fruit fly outbreaks and exotic incursions. HRN and HSI could be used for exports and imports and the associated levels of risk mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:2717 / 2729
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FRUIT FLIES AND LANCE FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITOIDEA) AND THEIR HOST PLANTS IN A CONSERVATION UNIT OF THE CERRADO BIOME IN TOCANTINS, BRAZIL
    Do Bomfim, Darcy A.
    Gisloti, Laura J.
    Uchoa, Manoel A.
    FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 2014, 97 (03) : 1139 - 1147
  • [42] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REFLECTANCE SPECTRA OF HOST PLANT-SURFACES AND VISUAL DETECTION OF HOST FRUIT BY RHAGOLETIS-POMONELLA FLIES
    OWENS, ED
    PROKOPY, RJ
    PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1986, 11 (03) : 297 - 307
  • [43] Host habitat preference of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of tephritid fruit flies
    Eitam, Avi
    Vargas, Roger I.
    ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 100 (04) : 603 - 608
  • [44] Adaptation to host plants modulates the dependence of tephritid fruit flies on their gut bacterial communities
    Zeng, Tian
    Hassan, Babar
    Shakeel, Muhammad
    Cheng, Daifeng
    Riegler, Markus
    Yang, Fan
    Xiao, Qian
    Jiang, Qiuying
    Chen, Siqi
    Ning, Dongdong
    Ni, Meihong
    Lu, Yongyue
    Xu, Yijuan
    ENTOMOLOGIA GENERALIS, 2024, 44 (04) : 981 - 992
  • [45] EFFECTS OF EGG LOAD ON FINDING AND ACCEPTANCE OF HOST FRUIT IN CERATITIS-CAPITATA FLIES
    PROKOPY, RJ
    ROITBERG, BD
    VARGAS, RI
    PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1994, 19 (02) : 124 - 132
  • [46] Host shifts in economically significant fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) with high degree of polyphagy
    He, Jiayao
    Chen, Ke
    Jiang, Fan
    Pan, Xubin
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (20): : 13692 - 13701
  • [47] DNA barcode variability and host plant usage of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Thailand
    Kunprom, Chonticha
    Pramual, Pairot
    GENOME, 2016, 59 (10) : 792 - 804
  • [48] Host preference and host suitability in an egg-pupal fruit fly parasitoid, Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hym., Braconidae)
    Quimio, GM
    Walter, GH
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY, 2001, 125 (03) : 135 - 140
  • [49] Host plant record for the fruit flies, Anastrepha fumipennis and A-nascimentoi (Diptera, Tephritidae)
    Uramoto, Keiko
    Martins, David S.
    Lima, Rita C. A.
    Zucchi, Roberto A.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE, 2008, 8
  • [50] INTERACTION BETWEEN FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AND THE HOST PLANT Sorocea bonplandii (MORACEAE)
    Neutzling, Alexandre S.
    Nunes, Adrise M.
    Kruger, Alexandra P.
    Garcia, Flavio R. M.
    INTERCIENCIA, 2016, 41 (10) : 686 - 690