Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks

被引:0
|
作者
Jenelle Feather
Guillaume Leclerc
Aleksander Mądry
Josh H. McDermott
机构
[1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
[2] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,McGovern Institute
[3] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Center for Brains, Minds and Machines
[4] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
[5] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
[6] Harvard University,Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology
[7] Flatiron Institute,Center for Computational Neuroscience
来源
Nature Neuroscience | 2023年 / 26卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Deep neural network models of sensory systems are often proposed to learn representational transformations with invariances like those in the brain. To reveal these invariances, we generated ‘model metamers’, stimuli whose activations within a model stage are matched to those of a natural stimulus. Metamers for state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised neural network models of vision and audition were often completely unrecognizable to humans when generated from late model stages, suggesting differences between model and human invariances. Targeted model changes improved human recognizability of model metamers but did not eliminate the overall human–model discrepancy. The human recognizability of a model’s metamers was well predicted by their recognizability by other models, suggesting that models contain idiosyncratic invariances in addition to those required by the task. Metamer recognizability dissociated from both traditional brain-based benchmarks and adversarial vulnerability, revealing a distinct failure mode of existing sensory models and providing a complementary benchmark for model assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2017 / 2034
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks
    Feather, Jenelle
    Leclerc, Guillaume
    Madry, Aleksander
    Mcdermott, Josh H.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 26 (11) : 2017 - 2034
  • [2] Metamers of neural networks reveal divergence from human perceptual systems
    Feather, Jenelle
    Durango, Alex
    Gonzalez, Ray
    McDermott, Josh
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [3] Diverse Feature Visualizations Reveal Invariances in Early Layers of Deep Neural Networks
    Cadena, Santiago A.
    Weis, Marissa A.
    Gatys, Leon A.
    Bethge, Matthias
    Ecker, Alexander S.
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2018, PT XII, 2018, 11216 : 225 - 240
  • [4] TOPOLOGICAL SIMILARITY BETWEEN ARTIFICIAL AND BIOLOGICAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Du, Yu
    Wang, Liting
    Guo, Lei
    Han, Junwei
    Liu, Tianming
    Hu, Xintao
    [J]. 2023 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, ISBI, 2023,
  • [5] A Correspondence Between Normalization Strategies in Artificial and Biological Neural Networks
    Shen, Yang
    Wang, Julia
    Navlakha, Saket
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2021, 33 (12) : 3179 - 3203
  • [6] BIOLOGICAL ANALOGIES OF THE ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    WOINAROSCHY, A
    [J]. REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 1995, 46 (03): : 267 - 270
  • [7] From Artificial to Biological Neural Networks
    Grosu, Radu
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY (CMSB 2016), 2016, 9859 : 334 - 334
  • [8] The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
    Pircher, Thomas
    Pircher, Bianca
    Schluecker, Eberhard
    Feigenspan, Andreas
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [9] The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
    Thomas Pircher
    Bianca Pircher
    Eberhard Schlücker
    Andreas Feigenspan
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [10] Modelling of biological neurons by artificial neural networks
    Tandeitnik, P
    Guterman, H
    [J]. NINETEENTH CONVENTION OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS IN ISRAEL, 1996, : 239 - 242