The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

被引:0
|
作者
Paula R. Williamson
Douglas G. Altman
Heather Bagley
Karen L. Barnes
Jane M. Blazeby
Sara T. Brookes
Mike Clarke
Elizabeth Gargon
Sarah Gorst
Nicola Harman
Jamie J. Kirkham
Angus McNair
Cecilia A. C. Prinsen
Jochen Schmitt
Caroline B. Terwee
Bridget Young
机构
[1] University of Liverpool,MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics
[2] University of Oxford,Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences
[3] University of Bristol,MRC ConDuCT II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, School of Social and Community Medicine
[4] Queen’s University Belfast,Centre for Public Health
[5] National University of Ireland Galway and HRB Trials Methodology Research Network,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research
[6] VU University Medical Center,Center for Evidence
[7] Technische Univesität Dresden,based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät
来源
Trials | / 18卷
关键词
Core outcome set; Clinical trial; COMET Initiative; Patients and the public;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. It is now widely acknowledged that insufficient attention has been paid to the choice of outcomes measured in clinical trials. Researchers are increasingly addressing this issue through the development and use of a core outcome set, an agreed standardised collection of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QUATTRO, VERSION 1.0
    KITTLE, PW
    LIBRARY SOFTWARE REVIEW, 1988, 7 (06): : 430 - 431
  • [22] CRITERIUM, VERSION-1.0
    WHITE, F
    LIBRARY SOFTWARE REVIEW, 1990, 9 (05): : 320 - 324
  • [23] AUTONOM, VERSION-1.0
    SMITH, DA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1992, 114 (26) : 10680 - 10680
  • [24] BOXES AND ARROWS, VERSION 1.0
    BUCHMAN, J
    LIBRARY SOFTWARE REVIEW, 1986, 5 (06): : 367 - 369
  • [25] A REVIEW OF FAULTREASE VERSION 1.0
    YOUNGBLOOD, RW
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1991, 11 (02) : 343 - 348
  • [26] The Laboratory Interpreter, version 1.0
    LaMarca, J
    Conner, R
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (21): : 2084 - 2085
  • [27] MOLECULAR EDITOR - VERSION 1.0
    DEMING, RL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 109 (22) : 6906 - 6906
  • [28] MAPVIEWER, VERSION-1.0
    JOHNSON, SM
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1991, 41 (03): : 321 - 321
  • [29] THEMAPS VERSION-1.0
    LAHIRI, M
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1989, 41 (04): : 500 - 501
  • [30] MORPH, WINDOWS VERSION 1.0
    不详
    IEEE CIRCUITS & DEVICES, 1994, 10 (02): : 46 - 46