Validation protocol for whole-body dosimetry in an agricultural exposure study

被引:0
|
作者
Jiho Lee
Eunhye Kim
Yongho Shin
Jonghwa Lee
Junghak Lee
Wolfgang Maasfeld
Jeong-Han Kim
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences
[2] Bayer CropScience,undefined
来源
关键词
Exposure; IOM sampler; Kresoxim-methyl; Method validation; Pesticide; Whole-body dosimetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Agricultural workers exposed to pesticides can experience adverse health impacts depending on toxicity and exposure amount. Whole-body dosimetry (WBD) is the most reliable, practical, and realistic method for measuring exposure. Since validation of analytical and experimental methodologies is critical for quantitative determination of exposure, we conducted a validation procedure to design an essential protocol for WBD exposure studies. Using the fungicide kresoxim-methyl, matrix-matched standards were prepared with various matrices including outer cloth, inner cloth, washing solution for gloves and hands, gauze, and glass fiber filter (IOM sampler) to determine the instrumental limit of quantitation for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (2 ng) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) (10 pg). Method limits of quantitation (MLOQ) were also set for HPLC (0.1 mg/L) and LC–MS/MS (0.005 mg/L). We observed good analysis repeatability (coefficient of variation < 6%), and the linearity of the calibration curves was reasonable (r2 > 0.998) in the range of 0.001–10 mg/L in various matrices. Recovery tests were carried out at three levels of concentration (MLOQ, 10 MLOQ, and 100 MLOQ) and resulted in good recoveries (72.7–105.6%). We did not observe breakthrough of the compound in tests of holding capacity for glass fiber pesticide filters. The procedures established in the present study are applicable as an essential, comprehensive protocol for exposure assessment studies using WBD.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 130
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POSTURAL STABILITY AFTER WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION EXPOSURE
    CORNELIUS, KM
    REDFERN, MS
    STEINER, LJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 1994, 13 (04) : 343 - 351
  • [42] Uncertainty in the evaluation of occupational exposure to whole-body vibration
    Pinto, Iole
    Stacchini, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2006, 298 (03) : 556 - 562
  • [43] WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION EXPOSURE OF MALAYSIAN TAXI DRIVERS
    Ismail, A. R.
    Abdullah, S. N. A.
    Abdullah, A. A.
    Deros, B. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 11 : 2786 - 2792
  • [44] Prostate Cancer and Occupational Whole-Body Vibration Exposure
    Nadalin, Victoria
    Kreiger, Nancy
    Parent, Marie-Elise
    Salmoni, Alan
    Sass-Kortsak, Andrea
    Siemiatycki, Jack
    Sloan, Margaret
    Purdham, James
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2012, 56 (08): : 968 - 974
  • [45] INVESTIGATION OF A POTENTIAL HIGH WHOLE-BODY RADIATION EXPOSURE
    THOMPSON, JJ
    BROOKS, AL
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1975, 29 (06): : 897 - 897
  • [46] Human exposure to whole-body vibration and medical therapy
    Wasserman, DE
    [J]. SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1997, 31 (07): : 5 - 5
  • [47] A small whole-body exposure chamber for laboratory use
    O'Shaughnessy, PT
    Achutan, C
    O'Neill, ME
    Thorne, PS
    [J]. INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 15 (03) : 251 - 263
  • [48] Performance of a portable whole-body mouse exposure system
    Oldham, MJ
    Phalen, RF
    Robinson, RJ
    Kleinman, MT
    [J]. INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 16 (09) : 657 - 662
  • [49] Absorption of energy during whole-body vibration exposure
    Lundstrom, R
    Holmlund, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1998, 215 (04) : 789 - 799
  • [50] Whole-body vibration exposure in metropolitan bus drivers
    Lewis, C. A.
    Johnson, P. W.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2012, 62 (07): : 519 - 524