Dopamine perturbation of gene co-expression networks reveals differential response in schizophrenia for translational machinery

被引:0
|
作者
Mark Z. Kos
Jubao Duan
Alan R. Sanders
Lucy Blondell
Eugene I. Drigalenko
Melanie A. Carless
Pablo V. Gejman
Harald H. H. Göring
机构
[1] University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine,South Texas Diabetes and Obesity Institute, Department of Human Genetics
[2] NorthShore University HealthSystem,Center for Psychiatric Genetics
[3] University of Chicago,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience
[4] Texas Biomedical Research Institute,Department of Genetics
[5] Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia (MGS) Collaboration,Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane and Queensland Brain Institute
[6] NorthShore University HealthSystem,undefined
[7] and University of Chicago,undefined
[8] Stanford University,undefined
[9] National Cancer Institute,undefined
[10] Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center,undefined
[11] The University of Queensland,undefined
[12] University of Colorado Denver,undefined
[13] Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Emory University,undefined
[14] University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine,undefined
[15] Mount Sinai School of Medicine,undefined
[16] University of California at San Francisco,undefined
[17] Washington University,undefined
来源
Translational Psychiatry | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia (SZ) postulates that positive symptoms of SZ, in particular psychosis, are due to disturbed neurotransmission via the dopamine (DA) receptor D2 (DRD2). However, DA is a reactive molecule that yields various oxidative species, and thus has important non-receptor-mediated effects, with empirical evidence of cellular toxicity and neurodegeneration. Here we examine non-receptor-mediated effects of DA on gene co-expression networks and its potential role in SZ pathology. Transcriptomic profiles were measured by RNA-seq in B-cell transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines from 514 SZ cases and 690 controls, both before and after exposure to DA ex vivo (100 μM). Gene co-expression modules were identified using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis for both baseline and DA-stimulated conditions, with each module characterized for biological function and tested for association with SZ status and SNPs from a genome-wide panel. We identified seven co-expression modules under baseline, of which six were preserved in DA-stimulated data. One module shows significantly increased association with SZ after DA perturbation (baseline: P = 0.023; DA-stimulated: P = 7.8 × 10-5; ΔAIC = −10.5) and is highly enriched for genes related to ribosomal proteins and translation (FDR = 4 × 10−141), mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and neurodegeneration. SNP association testing revealed tentative QTLs underlying module co-expression, notably at FASTKD2 (top P = 2.8 × 10−6), a gene involved in mitochondrial translation. These results substantiate the role of translational machinery in SZ pathogenesis, providing insights into a possible dopaminergic mechanism disrupting mitochondrial function, and demonstrates the utility of disease-relevant functional perturbation in the study of complex genetic etiologies.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gene Co-Expression Networks Restructured Gene Fusion in Rhabdomyosarcoma Cancers
    Helm, Bryan R.
    Zhan, Xiaohui
    Pandya, Pankita H.
    Murray, Mary E.
    Pollok, Karen E.
    Renbarger, Jamie L.
    Ferguson, Michael J.
    Han, Zhi
    Ni, Dong
    Zhang, Jie
    Huang, Kun
    GENES, 2019, 10 (09)
  • [42] Incorporating Motif Analysis into Gene Co-expression Networks Reveals Novel Modular Expression Pattern and New Signaling Pathways
    Ma, Shisong
    Shah, Smit
    Bohnert, Hans J.
    Snyder, Michael
    Dinesh-Kumar, Savithramma P.
    PLOS GENETICS, 2013, 9 (10):
  • [43] Annotation of gene function in citrus using gene expression information and co-expression networks
    Wong, Darren C. J.
    Sweetman, Crystal
    Ford, Christopher M.
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [44] Annotation of gene function in citrus using gene expression information and co-expression networks
    Darren CJ Wong
    Crystal Sweetman
    Christopher M Ford
    BMC Plant Biology, 14
  • [45] Co-expression analysis reveals key gene modules of bone metastases
    Huang, Yong
    Chu, Tongwei
    Liao, Tongquan
    Hu, Xu
    Huang, Bo
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (03) : 552 - 560
  • [46] Gene-Microbiome Co-expression Networks in Colon Cancer
    Uriarte-Navarrete, Irving
    Hernandez-Lemus, Enrique
    de Anda-Jauregui, Guillermo
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [47] Construction and Analysis of Gene Co-Expression Networks in Escherichia coli
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Li
    Long, Xuhe
    You, Weixin
    Zhong, Yuexian
    Wang, Menglin
    Tao, Huan
    Lin, Shoukai
    He, Huaqin
    CELLS, 2018, 7 (03)
  • [48] ICN: extracting interconnected communities in gene co-expression networks
    Wu, Qiong
    Ma, Tianzhou
    Liu, Qingzhi
    Milton, Donald K.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Chen, Shuo
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 37 (14) : 1997 - 2003
  • [49] Identifying the optimal gene and gene set in hepatocellular carcinoma based on differential expression and differential co-expression algorithm
    Dong, Li-Yang
    Zhou, Wei-Zhong
    Ni, Jun-Wei
    Xiang, Wei
    Hu, Wen-Hao
    Yu, Chang
    Li, Hai-Yan
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 37 (02) : 1066 - 1074
  • [50] Investigating the Combinatory Effects of Biological Networks on Gene Co-expression
    Zhang, Cheng
    Lee, Sunjae
    Mardinoglu, Adil
    Hua, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 7