Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures with short- or long-segment posterior fixation in magerl type a fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Murat Altay
Bülent Ozkurt
Cem Nuri Aktekin
Akif Muhtar Ozturk
Özgür Dogan
A. Yalçin Tabak
机构
[1] Numune Education and Research Hospital,Department of 5th Orthopaedics Clinic
来源
European Spine Journal | 2007年 / 16卷
关键词
Thoracolumbar fracture; Classification; Spinal instrumentation; Short/long;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The treatment of thoracolumbar fractures remains controversial. A review of the literature showed that short-segment posterior fixation (SSPF) alone led to a high incidence of implant failure and correction loss. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes of the SS- and long-segment posterior fixation (LSPF) in unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures (T12–L2) in Magerl Type A fractures. The patients were divided into two groups according to the number of instrumented levels. Group I included 32 patients treated by SSPF (four screws: one level above and below the fracture), and Group II included 31 patients treated by LSPF (eight screws: two levels above and below the fracture). Clinical outcomes and radiological parameters (sagittal index, SI; and canal compromise, CC) were compared according to demographic features, localizations, load-sharing classification (LSC) and Magerl subgroups, statistically. The fractures with more than 10° correction loss at sagittal plane were analyzed in each group. The groups were similar with regard to age, gender, LSC, SI, and CC preoperatively. The mean follow-ups were similar for both groups, 36 and 33 months, respectively. In Group II, the correction values of SI, and CC were more significant than in Group I. More than 10° correction loss occurred in six of the 32 fractures in Group I and in two of the 31 patients in Group II. SSPF was found inadequate in patients with high load sharing scores. Although radiological outcomes (SI and CC remodeling) were better in Group II for all fracture types and localizations, the clinical outcomes (according to Denis functional scores) were similar except Magerl type A33 fractures. We recommend that, especially in patients, who need more mobility, with LSC point 7 or less with Magerl Type A31 and A32 fractures (LSC point 6 or less in Magerl Type A3.3) without neurological deficit, SSPF achieves adequate fixation, without implant failure and correction loss. In Magerl Type A33 fractures with LSC point 7 or more (LSC points 8–9 in Magerl Type A31 and A32) without severe neurologic deficit, LSPF is more beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1155
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A REDUCTION FIXATION SYSTEM FOR UNSTABLE THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES
    CHANG, KW
    SPINE, 1992, 17 (08) : 879 - 886
  • [32] Analysis of factors associated with the failure of treatment in thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with short-segment posterior spinal fixation
    Ehsan Alimohammadi
    Seyed Reza Bagheri
    Benson Joseph
    Hasti Sharifi
    Bita Shokri
    Lida Khodadadi
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [33] Analysis of factors associated with the failure of treatment in thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with short-segment posterior spinal fixation
    Alimohammadi, Ehsan
    Bagheri, Seyed Reza
    Joseph, Benson
    Sharifi, Hasti
    Shokri, Bita
    Khodadadi, Lida
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [34] Clinical outcomes of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures: combined posterior short-segment correction followed by thoracoscopic corpectomy and fusion
    Wilson Z. Ray
    Khaled M. Krisht
    Andrew T. Dailey
    Meic H. Schmidt
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2013, 155 : 1179 - 1186
  • [35] Clinical outcomes of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures: combined posterior short-segment correction followed by thoracoscopic corpectomy and fusion
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    Krisht, Khaled M.
    Dailey, Andrew T.
    Schmidt, Meic H.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2013, 155 (07) : 1179 - 1186
  • [36] Unstable Thoracolumbar Injuries: Factors Affecting the Decision for Short- Segment vs Long- Segment Posterior Fixation
    Cabrera, Juan P.
    Guiroy, Alfredo
    Carazzo, Charles A.
    Yurac, Ratko
    Valacco, Marcelo
    Vialle, Emiliano
    Joaquim, Andrei F.
    Group, A. O. Spine Latin America Trauma Study
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (05): : 772 - 778
  • [37] Mono-segment fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures
    Perera, Andrea
    Qureshi, Anjum
    Brecknell, John Edward
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 29 (03) : 358 - 361
  • [38] Is Short Same-Segment Fixation Really Better than Short-Segment Posterior Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures?
    Ren, Hai-long
    Wang, Ji-xing
    Jiang, Jian-ming
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (21) : 1470 - 1478
  • [39] Treatment of traumatic unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures with transpedicular screw fixation
    Riaz-ur-Rehman
    Azmatullah
    Azam, Farooq
    Mushtaq
    Shah, Mewat
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 61 (10) : 1005 - 1008
  • [40] Biomechanical Comparison Between Posterior Long-Segment Fixation, Short-Segment Fixation, and Short-Segment Fixation With Intermediate Screws for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    Wannaratsiri, Nutthee
    Sukjamsri, Chamaiporn
    Benyajati, Chi-Na
    Limthongkul, Pimpa
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (03): : 442 - 448