A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436]

被引:16
|
作者
Cockayne S. [1 ]
Torgerson D.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of York, York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, York
关键词
Health Care Setting; Postal Questionnaire; Increase Response Rate; Research Ethic Committee; Patient Information Leaflet;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-5-34
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Postal questionnaires are widely used to collect outcome data on participants. However, a poor response to questionnaires will reduce the statistical power of the study and may introduce bias. A meta analysis of ten trials offering study results, largely in the fields of education and marketing, was shown to be ineffective, with the odds ratio for response with offering research findings is 0.92 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.11). However uncertainty still exists as it is uncertain whether results from such trials can be extrapolated to that of a health care setting. The aim of this study was to assess whether offering participants study results increases the response rates to postal questionnaires. Methods: 1038 women aged over 70 years were remotely randomised by computer in a 3:1 ratio. 250 participants did not receive the offer of knowing the results of the trial and 788 participants were offered the results of the trial in a postal questionnaire. The main outcome measure was response rate. Chi square test was used to evaluate the overall differences in response rate between the two groups. An adjusted analysis, adjusting for whether the participant was taking calcium and age was also undertaken. Results: The response rates were not significantly different Odds Ratio 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.48 to 1.63) p = 0.69. Conclusion: Offering study results to women living in the community aged over 70 does not increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Although researchers have an ethical obligation to offer participants study results, since 10% of women did not wish to receive the results, investigators should give participants the option to opt out of receiving the study's results. © 2005 Cockayne and Torgerson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of hand versus electronic signatures on response rates in postal surveys: a randomised controlled trial among emergency physicians in Canada
    Patel, Dilan
    Taljaard, Monica
    Yadav, Krishan
    Hickey, Michael
    Perry, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [32] Pen and Social Incentive Letter Retention Study within a Trial (SWAT) - An embedded, factorial design randomised controlled trial to investigate whether the inclusion of a pen and/or social incentive text cover letter included with the 12-month postal questionnaire improved response rates
    James, Sophie
    Parker, Adwoa
    Torgerson, David
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [33] Increasing response rates to follow-up questionnaires in health intervention research: Randomized controlled trial of a gift card prize incentive
    Morgan, Amy J.
    Rapee, Ronald M.
    Bayer, Jordana K.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (04) : 381 - 386
  • [34] Evaluation of the effectiveness of an incentive strategy on the questionnaire response rate in parents of premature babies: a randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT) nested within SIFT
    Juszczak, Edmund
    Hewer, Oliver
    Partlett, Christopher
    Hurd, Madeleine
    Bari, Vasha
    Bowler, Ursula
    Linsell, Louise
    Dorling, Jon
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [35] Evaluation of the effectiveness of an incentive strategy on the questionnaire response rate in parents of premature babies: a randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT) nested within SIFT
    Edmund Juszczak
    Oliver Hewer
    Christopher Partlett
    Madeleine Hurd
    Vasha Bari
    Ursula Bowler
    Louise Linsell
    Jon Dorling
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [36] Unconditional and conditional monetary incentives to increase response to mailed questionnaires: A randomized controlled study within a trial (SWAT)
    Young, Ben
    Bedford, Laura
    das Nair, Roshan
    Gallant, Stephanie
    Littleford, Roberta
    Robertson, John F. R.
    Schembri, Stuart
    Sullivan, Frank M.
    Vedhara, Kavita
    Kendrick, Denise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (03) : 893 - 902
  • [37] Uptake of interventions to communicate results of a phase III randomised controlled trial to participants: early results from the Show RESPECT study (ISRCTN96189403)
    South, Annabelle
    Purvis, Cara
    Spurdens, Ania
    James, Elizabeth
    Diaz-Montana, Carlos
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    Cragg, William J.
    Gillies, Katie
    Santana, Sierra
    Joharatnam-Hogan, Nalinie
    MacNair, Archie
    Copas, Andrew J.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [38] Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
    Benjamin Woolf
    Phil Edwards
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [39] Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial nested within a systematic review
    Woolf, Benjamin
    Edwards, Phil
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] Evaluation of the effectiveness of an incentive strategy on the questionnaire response rate in parents of premature babies. A randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT) nested within SIFT
    Juszczak, Ed
    Partlett, Christopher
    Linsell, Louise
    Rounding, Catherine
    Dorling, Jon
    Hurd, Madeleine Claire
    Hewer, Oliver
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20