Comparative performance of dairy cows in low-input smallholder and high-input production systems in South Africa

被引:0
|
作者
S. Abin
C. Visser
C. B. Banga
机构
[1] University of Pretoria,Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences
[2] ARC Animal Production Institute,undefined
来源
关键词
Lactation curve; Production; Reproduction; Somatic cell count;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of dairy cows in the low-input smallholder system against their counterparts in the high-input system, in South Africa. Data comprised of cow performance records from the national dairy recording scheme. Performance measures included production (305-day yields of milk, fat, and protein), lactation length, somatic cell count (SCC), and reproductive traits, represented by age at first calving (AFC) and calving interval (CI). Least squares means of each trait were compared between the two systems, and lactation curves for production traits and SCC were plotted for each production system. Mean yields of milk, fat, and protein were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the smallholder (4097 ± 165, 174 ± 5.1, and 141 ± 4.5 respectively) compared to the high-input system (6921 ± 141, 298 ± 4.7, and 245 ± 4.1 respectively). Mean lactation length was significantly (P < 0.05) shorter for the smallholder (308 ± 15.1) than the high-input system (346 ± 12.8). Log-transformed somatic cell count (SCS) was, however, significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the smallholder (2.41 ± 0.01) relative to the high-input system (2.27 ± 0.01). Cows in high-input herds showed typical lactation curves, in contrast to the flat and low peaking curves obtained for the smallholder system. Cows on smallholder herds had their first calving significantly (P < 0.05) older (30 ± 0.5) than those in the high-input system (27 ± 0.5). There was, however, no significant difference (P < 0.05) in CI between the two systems. These results highlight large room for improvement of dairy cow performance in the smallholder system and could assist in decision-making aimed at improving the productivity of the South African dairy industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1484
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reproduction efficiency in Romanian buffalo cows under low-input and intensive production systems
    Gavojdian, D.
    Nicolae, I.
    Mincu, M.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2022, 57 : 87 - 87
  • [22] Low-input pasture backgrounding system is more profitable through harvest than high-input drylot system.
    Mathis, C. P.
    Cox, S. H.
    Petersen, M. K.
    Loest, C. L.
    Endecott, R. L.
    Encinias, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 167 - 167
  • [23] Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a long-term field trial comparing low-input (organic, biological) and high-input (conventional) farming systems in a crop rotation
    Mäder, P
    Edenhofer, S
    Boller, T
    Wiemken, A
    Niggli, U
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2000, 31 (02) : 150 - 156
  • [24] Effect of management factors on reproductive and milk production performance of a dairy sheep breed adapted to low-input management systems
    Tzanidakis, N.
    Voutzourakis, N.
    Stefanakis, A.
    Brozos, C. N.
    Sotiraki, S.
    Kiossis, E. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 68 (01): : 67 - 78
  • [25] Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production
    Von Cossel, Moritz
    Lewandowski, Iris
    Elbersen, Berien
    Staritsky, Igor
    Van Eupen, Michiel
    Iqbal, Yasir
    Mantel, Stefan
    Scordia, Danilo
    Testa, Giorgio
    Cosentino, Salvatore Luciano
    Maliarenko, Oksana
    Eleftheriadis, Ioannis
    Zanetti, Federica
    Monti, Andrea
    Lazdina, Dagnija
    Neimane, Santa
    Lamy, Isabelle
    Ciadamidaro, Lisa
    Sanz, Marina
    Esteban Carrasco, Juan
    Ciria, Pilar
    McCallum, Ian
    Trindade, Luisa M.
    Van Loo, Eibertus N.
    Elbersen, Wolter
    Fernando, Ana Luisa
    Papazoglou, Eleni G.
    Alexopoulou, Efthymia
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (16)
  • [26] THE ROLE OF LOW-INPUT SYSTEMS IN ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION
    LANGHOLZ, HJ
    [J]. ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 1992, 64 (3-4): : 271 - 282
  • [27] Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a long-term field trial comparing low-input (organic, biological) and high-input (conventional) farming systems in a crop rotation
    P. Mäder
    Stephan Edenhofer
    Thomas Boller
    Andres Wiemken
    Urs Niggli
    [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2000, 31 : 150 - 156
  • [28] Physiological adaptations and ovarian cyclicity of Holstein and Montbeliarde cows under two low-input production systems
    Pires, J. A. A.
    Chilliard, Y.
    Delavaud, C.
    Rouel, J.
    Pomies, D.
    Blanc, F.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2015, 9 (12) : 1986 - 1995
  • [29] Differentiation between milk from low-input biodynamic, intermediate-input organic and high-input conventional farming systems using fluorescence excitation spectroscopy (FES) and fatty acids
    Wohlers, Jenifer
    Stolz, Peter
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 2019, 35 (03) : 172 - 186
  • [30] Effect of abiotic and biotic factors on subclinical mastitis occurrence in low-input dairy sheep production systems
    Tzanidakis, N.
    Brozos, C. N.
    Voutzourakis, N.
    Stefanakis, A.
    Malama, E.
    Zoller, D.
    Zdragkas, A.
    Hickford, J.
    Sotiraki, S.
    Kiossis, E.
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2021, 198