Environmental impacts of structural lumber production in Japan

被引:0
|
作者
Katsuyuki Nakano
Masahiro Koide
Yuta Yamada
Takuya Ogawa
Nobuaki Hattori
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan University,College of Policy Science
[2] Sustainable Management Promotion Organization (SuMPO),undefined
[3] Bluedotgreen,undefined
[4] Usuki Energy,undefined
[5] Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology,undefined
来源
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Greenhouse gas emissions; Resource consumption; Sawn wood; Timber; Biomass; Sawmill; Allocation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Low-rise buildings in Japan are predominantly made of wood. Furthermore, the government promotes the use of wood in mid- and high-rise buildings to tackle climate change. Therefore, the environmental impact of structural lumber should be assessed. In this study, we evaluated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and resource consumption associated with structural lumber production using life cycle assessment. Herein, we focused on Japanese Agricultural Standard certified structural lumber (artificially dried lumber and machine-grade structural lumber) made from Japanese roundwood. To ensure representativeness, 15 companies and 15 sawmills covering more than 50% of Japan's structural lumber production were selected and data on their production were collected. The results show that the GHG emissions and resource consumption of Japanese structural lumber are 7.99 × 10 kg-CO2e/m3 and 1.77 × 10–3 kg-Sb eq./m3, respectively. The major sources of GHG emissions are electricity and roundwood production. Roundwood and metal tools significantly affect resource consumption. The recycling of rare metals in tools is essential for reducing resource consumption. A significant amount of heat energy is utilized for drying, and this heat energy is supplied from both biomass and fossil fuels. GHG emissions and resource consumption are 5.3 and 1.6 times higher, respectively, if biomass fuel is replaced by fossil fuel. Policies supporting the introduction of biomass boilers have been highly effective. It is recommended to further promote measures such as replacing fossil fuel-based boilers with biomass boilers and effectively utilizing biomass boilers in multiple regional sawmills. In addition, switching from grid electricity to electricity generated by renewable energy sources is effective for further reducing environmental impacts. The long-term use of structural lumber is valid for combating global warming because it fixes carbon for decades. In this study, the CO2 emissions from biomasaluated in terms of carbon neutrality. Appropriate forest management is a prerequisite for carbon neutrality, and the promotion of sustainable forest management, such as reforestation after logging, is crucial.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Environmental impacts of construction material production
    Ng, Shiu-tong Thomas
    Chan, Joseph H. L.
    Chan, Greg K. C.
    Zou, Joe W. W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 170 (03) : 169 - 184
  • [12] Assessing the environmental impacts of agrifood production
    Ittisak Jirapornvaree
    Tawadchai Suppadit
    Vikas Kumar
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2022, 24 : 1099 - 1112
  • [13] Negative Environmental Impacts of Production Technologies
    Besta, Petr
    Janovska, Kamila
    Martinek, Zdenek
    Svecova, Eva
    Drastich, Adam
    ROCZNIK OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2022, 24 : 307 - 325
  • [14] Environmental impacts the of production and use of biodiesel
    Snežana Živković
    Milan Veljković
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 191 - 199
  • [15] Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production
    Tuomisto, Hanna L.
    de Mattos, M. Joost Teixeira
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (14) : 6117 - 6123
  • [16] Environmental impacts the of production and use of biodiesel
    Zivkovic, Snezana
    Veljkovic, Milan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (01) : 191 - 199
  • [17] Assessing the environmental impacts of agrifood production
    Jirapornvaree, Ittisak
    Suppadit, Tawadchai
    Kumar, Vikas
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2022, 24 (04) : 1099 - 1112
  • [18] Variability in the environmental impacts of aggregate production
    Jullien, A.
    Proust, C.
    Martaud, T.
    Rayssac, E.
    Ropert, C.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2012, 62 : 1 - 13
  • [19] Environmental impacts of rare earth production
    Petra Zapp
    Andrea Schreiber
    Josefine Marx
    Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs
    MRS Bulletin, 2022, 47 : 267 - 275
  • [20] Environmental impacts of biofuel production and use
    Miller, C. Andrew
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238