The efficacy of psychosocial intervention for pain in breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
M. Johannsen
I. Farver
N. Beck
R. Zachariae
机构
[1] Aarhus University,Department of Psychology and Behavioral Science
[2] Aarhus University Hospital,Department of Oncology
[3] University of Southern Denmark,National Research Center of Psychotraumatology
来源
关键词
Psychosocial interventions; Pain; Breast cancer; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment is prevalent, and not all patients respond sufficiently to pharmacological treatment. Pain is recognized as a multi-dimensional phenomenon, which includes psychological and social components, and several clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions on pain in cancer patients and survivors. Our aim was to systematically review and quantify the existing research on the effect of psychosocial interventions on pain in breast cancer patients and survivors. Two independent raters reviewed 474 abstracts for eligibility, leading to the identification of 26 independent and eligible studies published between 1983 and 2012, which were assessed for their methodological quality and subjected to meta-analytic evaluation. A total of 1786 participants were included in the analyses. A statistically significant and robust overall effect size was found across all included studies (Hedges g = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.20–0.40; p < 0.001). However, the effect size was considerably smaller (0.21), when adjusted for possible publication bias. Furthermore, the results were heterogeneous, and when exploring the sources of heterogeneity, studies of higher methodological quality were found to yield a more conservative effect size (g = 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.41) than studies of poorer quality (g = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.25–1.04). The results also indicated that patient educational approaches yielded a larger effect size (g = 0.64) than relaxation-based interventions (g = 0.31, 95 % CI: −0.05–0.67) and supportive group therapy (g = 0.17, 95 % CI: 0.02–0.32). Taken together, while suggestive of psychosocial intervention as an effective tool in the management of pain among breast cancer patients and survivors, the results should be interpreted as preliminary. The methodological quality of the existing research varied considerably, and only few studies had selected patients on the basis of the presence of pain and included pain as the primary outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 690
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiovascular outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Galimzhanov, Akhmetzhan
    Istanbuly, Sedralmontaha
    Han Naung Tun
    Ozbay, Benay
    Alasnag, Mirvat
    Ky, Bonnie
    Lyon, Alexander R.
    Kayikcioglu, Meral
    Tenekecioglu, Erhan
    Panagioti, Maria
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Abdel-Qadir, Husam
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (18) : 2018 - 2031
  • [22] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of psychological intervention nursing on the quality of life of breast cancer patients
    Li, Hanbing
    Li, Junfeng
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Lin, Shuai
    Yang, Wen
    Cai, Hui
    Feng, Xiaofen
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (05) : 882 - 891
  • [23] Digital Health Psychosocial Intervention in Adult Patients With Cancer and Their Families: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Yingzi
    Flannery, Marie
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Underhill-Blazey, Meghan
    Bobry, Melanie
    Leblanc, Natalie
    Rodriguez, Darcey
    Zhang, Chen
    [J]. JMIR CANCER, 2024, 10
  • [24] DIGITAL HEALTH PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTION IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH CANCER AND THEIR FAMILIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Zhang, Yingzi
    Flannery, Marie
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Underhill-Blazey, Meghan
    Bobry, Melanie
    Zhang, Chen
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2023, 50 (02)
  • [25] Efficacy and results of virtual nursing intervention for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fang, Hui
    Sun, Yajun
    Yu, Dongfeng
    Xu, Yuhong
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2024, 11 (07)
  • [26] Correction to: Psychosocial Interventions for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Marco Warth
    Joshua Zöller
    Friederike Köhler
    Corina Aguilar-Raab
    Jens Kessler
    Beate Ditzen
    [J]. Current Oncology Reports, 2021, 23
  • [27] Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Micklitz, Hannah M.
    Glass, Carla M.
    Bengel, Juergen
    Sander, Lasse B.
    [J]. BJPSYCH OPEN, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alinejadfard, Mohammadreza
    Rajai Firouzabadi, Shahryar
    Mohammadi, Ida
    Oraee, Soroush
    Golsorkh, Hossein
    Mahdavi, Sajjad
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [29] Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Laurien M Buffart
    Jannique GZ van Uffelen
    Ingrid I Riphagen
    Johannes Brug
    Willem van Mechelen
    Wendy J Brown
    Mai JM Chinapaw
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 12
  • [30] Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Buffart, Laurien M.
    van Uffelen, Jannique G. Z.
    Riphagen, Ingrid I.
    Brug, Johannes
    van Mechelen, Willem
    Brown, Wendy J.
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2012, 12