A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures

被引:367
|
作者
Geldmann, Jonas [1 ]
Manica, Andrea [2 ]
Burgess, Neil D. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Coad, Lauren [3 ,5 ]
Balmford, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Evolutionary Ecol Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[3] UNEP WCMC, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, DK-2100 Copenhagen E, Denmark
[5] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor 16115, Barat, Indonesia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
counterfactual; Human Development Index; human footprint; impact assessment; management effectiveness; AVOIDED DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION OUTCOMES; LAW-ENFORCEMENT; GOVERNANCE; IMPACTS; LAND; PERFORMANCE; LOCATION; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1908221116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One-sixth of the global terrestrial surface now falls within protected areas (PAs), making it essential to understand how far they mitigate the increasing pressures on nature which characterize the Anthropocene. In by far the largest analysis of this question to date and not restricted to forested PAs, we compiled data from 12,315 PAs across 152 countries to investigate their ability to reduce human pressure and how this varies with socioeconomic and management circumstances. While many PAs show positive outcomes, strikingly we find that compared with matched unprotected areas, PAs have on average not reduced a compound index of pressure change over the past 15 y. Moreover, in tropical regions average pressure change from cropland conversion has increased inside PAs even more than in matched unprotected areas. However, our results also confirm previous studies restricted to forest PAs, where pressures are increasing, but less than in counterfactual areas. Our results also show that countries with high national-level development scores have experienced lower rates of pressure increase over the past 15 y within their PAs compared with a matched outside area. Our results caution against the rapid establishment of new PAs without simultaneously addressing the conditions needed to enable their success.
引用
收藏
页码:23209 / 23215
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the effectiveness of global protected areas based on the difference in differences model
    Feng, Yuhao
    Wang, Yupin
    Su, Haojie
    Pan, Jiamin
    Sun, Yuanfeng
    Zhu, Jiangling
    Fang, Jingyun
    Tang, Zhiyao
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 130
  • [22] A global-level assessment of gulls (Larus spp.) as bioindicators of trace elements in coastal ecosystems
    Bahamonde, Paulina
    Espejo, Winfred
    Celis, Jose
    Montes, Isis-Yelena
    Barra, Ricardo O.
    [J]. LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AQUATIC RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (02): : 195 - 209
  • [23] Effectiveness of protected areas against land development in coastal areas of the Mediterranean global biodiversity hotspot
    Donnelly, A.
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, D.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 38
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF PROTECTED AREAS OF NATURE ON THE GLOBAL LEVEL AND A COMPARISON TO EUROPE AND SLOVENIA
    Sekoranja, Bernarda Bevc
    Pogacnik, Andrej
    [J]. GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2014, 58 (02) : 254 - 273
  • [25] Parks, people, and forest protection: An institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas
    Hayes, Tanya M.
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (12) : 2064 - 2075
  • [26] Assessment of the effectiveness of China's protected areas in enhancing ecosystem services
    Yu, Chaoyue
    Zhang, Zhonghao
    Jeppesen, Erik
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Yuexin
    Liu, Yongjie
    Lu, Qingling
    Wang, Chenxu
    Sun, Ximan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [27] Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets
    Chape, S
    Harrison, J
    Spalding, M
    Lysenko, I
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 360 (1454) : 443 - 455
  • [28] A global comparative analysis of impact evaluation methods in estimating the effectiveness of protected areas
    dos Santos Ribas, Luiz Guilherme
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Loyola, Rafael
    Bini, Luis Mauricio
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 246
  • [29] A global assessment of the impact of individual protected areas on preventing forest loss
    Yang, Hongbo
    Vina, Andres
    Winkler, Julie Ann
    Chung, Min Gon
    Huang, Qiongyu
    Dou, Yue
    McShea, William J.
    Songer, Melissa
    Zhang, Jindong
    Liu, Jianguo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 777
  • [30] Comparative Assessment of the Level of Plant Cover Synanthropization in Specially Protected Areas
    P. L. Gorchakovskii
    O. V. Telegova
    [J]. Russian Journal of Ecology, 2005, 36 : 365 - 370