A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures

被引:368
|
作者
Geldmann, Jonas [1 ]
Manica, Andrea [2 ]
Burgess, Neil D. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Coad, Lauren [3 ,5 ]
Balmford, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Evolutionary Ecol Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[3] UNEP WCMC, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, DK-2100 Copenhagen E, Denmark
[5] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor 16115, Barat, Indonesia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
counterfactual; Human Development Index; human footprint; impact assessment; management effectiveness; AVOIDED DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION OUTCOMES; LAW-ENFORCEMENT; GOVERNANCE; IMPACTS; LAND; PERFORMANCE; LOCATION; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1908221116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One-sixth of the global terrestrial surface now falls within protected areas (PAs), making it essential to understand how far they mitigate the increasing pressures on nature which characterize the Anthropocene. In by far the largest analysis of this question to date and not restricted to forested PAs, we compiled data from 12,315 PAs across 152 countries to investigate their ability to reduce human pressure and how this varies with socioeconomic and management circumstances. While many PAs show positive outcomes, strikingly we find that compared with matched unprotected areas, PAs have on average not reduced a compound index of pressure change over the past 15 y. Moreover, in tropical regions average pressure change from cropland conversion has increased inside PAs even more than in matched unprotected areas. However, our results also confirm previous studies restricted to forest PAs, where pressures are increasing, but less than in counterfactual areas. Our results also show that countries with high national-level development scores have experienced lower rates of pressure increase over the past 15 y within their PAs compared with a matched outside area. Our results caution against the rapid establishment of new PAs without simultaneously addressing the conditions needed to enable their success.
引用
收藏
页码:23209 / 23215
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures (vol 116, pg 23209, 2019)
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Manica, Andrea
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Coad, Lauren
    Balmford, Andrew
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (41) : 25945 - 25945
  • [2] Effectiveness in protected areas at resisting development pressures in China
    Meng, Ziqi
    Dong, Jinwei
    Zhai, Jun
    Huang, Lin
    Liu, Min
    Ellis, Erle C.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 141
  • [3] Multiple anthropogenic pressures challenge the effectiveness of protected areas in western Tanzania
    Giliba, Richard A.
    Fust, Pascal
    Kiffner, Christian
    Loos, Jacqueline
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (06)
  • [4] Anthropogenic vulnerability assessment of global terrestrial protected areas with a new framework
    Meng, Jiahui
    Li, Yaoqi
    Feng, Yuhao
    Hua, Fangyuan
    Shen, Xiaoli
    Li, Sheng
    Shrestha, Nawal
    Peng, Shijia
    Rahbek, Carsten
    Wang, Zhiheng
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 283
  • [5] Satellite Earth observation data to identify anthropogenic pressures in selected protected areas
    Nagendra, Harini
    Mairota, Paola
    Marangi, Carmela
    Lucas, Richard
    Dimopoulos, Panayotis
    Honrado, Joao Pradinho
    Niphadkar, Madhura
    Mucher, Caspar A.
    Tomaselli, Valeria
    Panitsa, Maria
    Tarantino, Cristina
    Manakos, Ioannis
    Blonda, Palma
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2015, 37 : 124 - 132
  • [6] Assessment and impact of anthropogenic disturbances in protected areas of northern Togo
    Folega FOUSSENI
    Dourma MARRA
    Kperkouma WALA
    Komlan BATAWILA
    Koffi AKPAGANA
    [J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2012, (03) : 216 - 223
  • [7] The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation
    L. Duncanson
    M. Liang
    V. Leitold
    J. Armston
    S. M. Krishna Moorthy
    R. Dubayah
    S. Costedoat
    B. J. Enquist
    L. Fatoyinbo
    S. J. Goetz
    M. Gonzalez-Roglich
    C. Merow
    P. R. Roehrdanz
    K. Tabor
    A. Zvoleff
    [J]. Nature Communications, 14
  • [8] The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation
    Duncanson, L.
    Liang, M.
    Leitold, V.
    Armston, J.
    Moorthy, S. M. Krishna
    Dubayah, R.
    Costedoat, S.
    Enquist, B. J.
    Fatoyinbo, L.
    Goetz, S. J.
    Gonzalez-Roglich, M.
    Merow, C.
    Roehrdanz, P. R.
    Tabor, K.
    Zvoleff, A.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [9] Environmental impact assessment (EIA) effectiveness in protected areas
    Alberts, Reece Cronje
    Retief, Francois Pieter
    Cilliers, Dirk Petrus
    Roos, Claudine
    Hauptfleisch, Morgan
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2021, 39 (04) : 290 - 303
  • [10] TOWARDS HARMONIZED MEASUREMENT OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH: AN ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL-LEVEL INDICATOR ALIGNMENT
    Newby, Holly
    Marsh, Andrew D.
    Ba, Mariame Gueye
    Carvajal, Liliana
    Dastgiri, Saeed
    Friedman, Howard S.
    Kagesten, Anna
    Keogh, Sarah
    Moller, Ann-Beth
    Tang, Kun
    Guthold, Regina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2023, 72 (03) : S58 - S58